Boycott bill passes through UK House of Lords

23 February 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The UK House of Lords has passed a bill to prohibit public authorities participating in boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Boycott bill passes through UK House of Lords

February 23rd, 2024

The UK House of Lords has passed a bill prohibiting public authorities from participating in boycotts, divestment and sanctions campaigns.

The Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) bill would prevent public authorities from boycotting goods or disinvesting from states or territories if to do so could be construed as being based on moral or political disapproval.

The bill includes provisions to allow the government to make regulations to specify certain countries to be exempt from the rules. The government has said it intends to use this power to exempt Russia and Belarus from the ban, meaning public authorities could boycott or disinvest from these countries.

The bill has been criticised for its clause that states Israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territories and the Occupied Golan Heights could not be exempted by regulations, meaning that for these territories to be exempted would require primary legislation.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe, a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, said: “It is vital that public bodies are not allowed to pursue policies, through their investment and procurement decisions, in order to try to legitimise a UK foreign policy that differs from that of His Majesty’s Government.”

Baroness Chapman of Darlington, a Labour peer in the House of Lords, said: “The naivety of the bill is to believe that trustees of pension schemes have, until now, been making investment decisions—which have a profound impact on their funds"—in response to local boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns.

“There is just no evidence for this. The risk is that the bill will serve only to heighten tensions.”

The bill passed through the House of Lords at its second reading this week and will be committed to the Committee of the Whole House, where amendments can be introduced. It will then go through the report stage and second reading before both the House of Commons and House of Lords will vote to accept any amendments.

Related Stories

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More

ISSB Prepares for Final SASB Updates with New Proposals

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More

From Prudence and Loyalty to Maximum Discretion: How US Fiduciary Duty Just Changed Shape

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More

Workers’ Rights Ruling: First French Firm Falls Foul of Labour Rights Rules

March 19, 2026
Read More