CCGG warns law firm’s proposed by-law weakens shareholder rights

20 October 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

EU Parliament signals more enforceable path for SFDR 2.0

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

CCGG warns law firm’s proposed by-law weakens shareholder rights 

October 20th, 2023

The Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG) has criticised a proposed bylaw that would give companies the ability to automatically postpone AGMs if votes against a director cross a certain threshold.

The bylaw was proposed by law firm Norton Rose Fulbright Canada to close a potential loophole in an amendment to the Canada Business Corporation Act, which it has been claimed allowed ‘sneak attacks’ by activist investors.

The act prevented company nominees to the board being appointed because there are no challengers.

However, the proposed bylaw will introduce an automatic 45-day postponement of an annual general meeting if the number of votes against a director crosses a certain threshold, giving the company time to try and change minds or encourage more shareholders to vote for the candidate.

CCGG CEO Catherine McCall told the Globe and Mail: “The real sneak attack investors should be worried about is the law firm’s attempt to water down hard-won shareholder rights.

“The time gives the issuer additional means to thwart any activist campaign in progress against any one or more of the directors.”

However, the postponement could be triggered regardless of whether there is an activist campaign in progress or not.

McCall said: “In essence, the bylaw has the potential to make every uncontested election a contested one. In situations where there is no fight for board seats, and shareholders are simply voting against a candidate they don’t want, the bylaw gives the board the opportunity to turn it into a fight.”

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

May 15, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

May 2, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More
AGM, Shareholer Proposals, Proxy Season

Minerva Proxy Update

April 24, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More