Collective governance - FSA says "Can Do"

19 August 2009

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Shareholders wanting to work together on "ad-hoc governance strategies" are unlikely to fall foul of the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA).

In a "safe harbour" letter to the Institutional Shareholders' Committee, the FSA's Sally Dewar sets out how its rules apply to shareholders wanting to work together to promote effective corporate governance in investee companies. Very specifically, the FSA says that its requirements "do not prevent legitimate activity of this nature."

The FSA wrote the letter in response to concerns raised by investor trade association following Sir David Walker's proposals to strengthen shareholder engagement. In a speech given in May, Hector Sants, FSA chief executive, said:  "Investors also need to challenge management to ensure their plans are credible.  A lesson for investors from this crisis must be that greater interrogation of how well a company is managed and the adequacy of its risk controls are all material factors fundamental to investment management.  A focus of a firms' risk-control framework must be an effective risk and audit committee and knowledgeable non-executives with a willingness to challenge senior management.   Investors must play a role in ensuring such a framework is in place and effective."

The FSA has set out its approach on the three key areas of its rules:

  1. The market abuse rules do not prevent investors from engaging collectively with the management of an investee company. However, trading on the basis of knowing another investor’s intentions or working jointly to avoid disclosure of shareholdings could constitute market abuse;
  2. FSA rules on disclosure of major shareholdings require that investors who have agreed to pursue the same long-term voting strategy should aggregate their shareholdings when considering whether their shareholdings reach the threshold for disclosure (3% of a company’s shares). However, this disclosure would be unlikely to be triggered by ad hoc discussions between investors on particular corporate issues; and
  3. Under the EU Acquisitions Directive that was implemented earlier this year, where investors are “acting in concert” they require FSA approval if they reach a controlling shareholding (10% or more of a company’s shares) in a regulated firm. “Acting in concert” is not defined in the Directive but the FSA does not view the requirement as preventing ad hoc discussions or understandings between investors that are intended solely to promote generally accepted principles of good corporate governance in firms in which they have invested.

Commenting on the letter, Alexander Justham, FSA director of markets, said: "There is nothing under FSA rules that prevents investors discussing matters when it is for a legitimate purpose. Our letter provides clarity to investors that they are free to engage with the boards of companies as Sir David Walker envisaged."

Links

Letter sent out to ISC >>

Hector Sants' speech >>

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ASX governance reform: simplification must preserve decision-useful disclosure

SHareholder meeting

Accountability Versus Allocation: Who Is Corporate Reporting For?

SHareholder meeting

SFDR Review Moves Forward, But Key Questions Remain for Investors

SHareholder meeting

German governance code reform: Minerva supports simplification, but draws a line at investor visibility

SHareholder meeting

FRC’s new regulatory approach signals a shift from rule-making to market stewardship

SHareholder meeting

Shein lists in Hong Kong at reduced valuation after protracted IPO journey

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Catalysing Corporate Governance: Japan and Korea Revamp Approaches

July 10, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Japan’s regulator urged to toughen ESG rules

June 25, 2021

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

Former iSoft directors summonsed

January 6, 2010

Sarah Wilson

Read More

Takeover Panel aims to clarify "concert party" concerns

September 11, 2009

Sarah Wilson

Read More

Bank pay: can UK become the Jones’ to keep up with?

August 14, 2009

Sarah Wilson

Read More

Sir David Walker's 39 Steps

July 16, 2009

Sarah Wilson

Read More