CSDDD rule secures European Parliament approval

7 June 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) has secured approval from the European Parliament.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

CSDDD rule secures European Parliament approval

June 7, 2023

The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) has secured approval from the European Parliament.

The directive means that companies will now be required to implement climate transition plans and disclose the impact of their value chains on human rights and the environment.

The new legislation will require all large EU companies and global companies with significant EU revenues to oversee the impact on human rights and environmental issues in their supply chains.

The Parliament voted 366 to 225 votes in favour of the landmark legislation.

Early reactions from various civil society organisations, such as Amnesty International and ECCJ, are overall positive while pointing out that certain provisions could have been stronger.

Welcoming the intention of the directive and the message it sends, Hannah Storey, Amnesty International policy advisor on business and human rights, said: “There are some troubling exemptions in the legislation which would make it very challenging to hold financial sector firms liable under civil law for human rights abuses and environmental harms.”

She added: “Companies also do not have to consider possible human rights abuses stemming from the misuse of their products. EU policymakers must urgently address these omissions during negotiations.”

Christopher Patz, policy officer at the ECCJ, commented that the emphasis would now be on what happens next within the legislative process.

“Eyes are on the EU to set the standard for how companies are expected to act,” he said.

“It’s imperative that in the upcoming trialogue, Parliament defends what progress has been made on access to justice, closes the loopholes and creates a strong due diligence law that can stand the stress test of social, ecological and geopolitical pressures.”

The version passed by parliament will now be reconciled with those being considered by the EU Council and the EU Commission.

After this, a final text on the legislation is set to be produced later this year.

The law faced last minute opposition, including an amendment tabled by German conservative MEP Angelika Niebler that would mandate the European Commission to convert the directive into a regulation six years after its implementation.

The directive comes after the European Parliament voted last month to support a proposed ban on environmental claims that are based solely on carbon offsetting schemes.

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas redomicile passes with high dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More