Effectiveness of SRD II questioned in shareholder survey

7 April 2021

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The directive, launched in September 2020, has been troubled by inconsistencies

Better Finance, the European financial services NGO, has launched a survey of shareholders after the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II) encountered teething issues shortly after launch.

The European Commission introduced SRD II legislation in September 2020 to facilitate the rights of shareholders across EU member states. However, evidence from Better Finance, also known as The European Federation of Investors and Financial Services Users, suggests the directive does not adequately tackle the challenges faced by cross-border investors, resulting in shareholders not being notified of key general meeting information.

Subsequently, the group is launching a survey to evaluate the experiences of investors to determine whether SRD II has indeed resulted in the anticipated improvements.

Under the directive, shareholders should be able to receive notifications regarding key information, including, times and dates, of the general meetings of companies they hold in their portfolio, regardless of where in the EU these companies are located.

This is meant to ensure that shareholders can exercise their rights across borders and attend and vote at annual general meetings in companies located in EU Member States other than their own.

However, shareholder’s initial experiences of SRD II’s shareholder information scheme, as relayed to Better Finance, suggest that the system is not properly functional, and investors are not being properly informed about general meetings in another country, or are encountering serious obstacles when attempting to exercise their rights at a general meeting abroad.

As such, the organisation has invited European shareholders to take part in its survey, which it hopes will gather meaningful information on investors experiences with SRD II, and to evaluate whether the directive has achieved its aim of improving accessibility for shareholders to exercise their rights.

SRD II amends the original SRD, which came into effect in 2007. Beyond providing information for shareholders, the directive also aims to increase the level and quality of engagement of asset owners and asset managers with their investee companies and seeks create a better link between pay and the performance of company directors.

Related Stories

EU Parliament signals more enforceable path for SFDR 2.0

May 7, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

Disney Defeat: Anti-ESG Proposal Pair Perform Poorly at 2026 AGM

March 27, 2026
Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More