EU: Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon

6 October 2017

Editor

EU regulation

The European Commission has ruled that global online retailer Amazon must repay €250 million in illegal state aid that was granted to it by Luxembourg as tax benefits. The Commission stated that under a rule adopted by Luxembourg Amazon paid substantially less tax than other businesses.

The Commission launched its investigation in October 2014 which has found that a tax ruling issued by Luxembourg in 2003, and extended in 2011, lowered the tax paid by Amazon in Luxembourg without any valid justification.

Luxembourg's tax ruling enabled Amazon to shift the vast majority of its profits from an Amazon group company that was subject to tax in Luxembourg (Amazon EU) to a company which was not subject to tax (Amazon Europe Holding Technologies), according to the Commission.

In particular, the Commission found that the tax ruling endorsed the payment of a royalty from Amazon EU to Amazon Europe Holding Technologies, which it said significantly reduced Amazon EU's taxable profits.

The Commission's investigation showed that the level of the royalty payments, endorsed by the tax ruling, was inflated and did not reflect economic reality. On this basis, the Commission concluded that the tax ruling granted a selective economic advantage to Amazon by allowing the group to pay less tax than other companies subject to the same national tax rules. In fact, the Commission said, the ruling enabled Amazon to avoid taxation on three quarters of the profits it made from all Amazon sales in the EU.

Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: "Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon. As a result, almost three quarters of Amazon's profits were not taxed. In other words, Amazon was allowed to pay four times less tax than other local companies subject to the same national tax rules. This is illegal under EU State aid rules. Member states cannot give selective tax benefits to multinational groups that are not available to others."

Meanwhile, the European Commission has referred the Irish government to the European Court of Justice for failing to recover €13 billion from technology company Apple. The Commission ruled last year that Apple had been the recipient of illegal state aid due to its preferential tax treatment in Ireland. The deadline to implement the Commission's decision on Apple's tax treatment was 3 January 2017 but the Irish government is still in the process of calculating the exact level of illegal state and aid which the Commission said it did not intend to conclude until March 2018.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Fifteen financial institutions push ISSB towards dedicated Nature Standard

SHareholder meeting

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

SHareholder meeting

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

SHareholder meeting

Tesla’s 2026 AGM sees no shareholder proposals for first time in over a decade

SHareholder meeting

Procter & Gamble shareholder rights proposals draw significant support

SHareholder meeting

Norway’s GPFG could ease nuclear weapons exclusions for allied defence companies

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 United States of America Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

US SEC Rule 14a-8 Rescission Proposal

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

NA100 benchmark

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

October 23, 2026
Read More
ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

October 23, 2026
Read More
ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny

ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny – stewardship claims now in scope

October 14, 2026
Read More
SFDR Review

SFDR review moves forward, but key questions remain for investors

September 11, 2026
Read More
Two woke issues walk into Wall Street

Two woke issues walk into Wall Street

August 27, 2026
Read More

EU Parliament Signals More Enforceable Path for SFDR 2.0

May 7, 2026
Read More