Federated Hermes questioned over SFOF association

26 August 2022

Elizabeth Pfeuti

US asset manager Federated Hermes has come under criticism for its apparent association with the State Financial Officers Foundation (SFOF), a vocal anti-ESG group.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Federated Hermes questioned over SFOF association 

August 25, 2022

US asset manager Federated Hermes has come under criticism for its apparent association with the State Financial Officers Foundation (SFOF), a vocal anti-ESG group. 

The SFOF is a Republican group, comprised of state treasurers from several ‘red states’ such as Oklahoma and Georgia, which has been campaigning against ESG-friendly federal regulation. 

Read Minerva's previous coverage of Federated Hermes:

https://www.old.manifest.co.uk/investors-warn-big-four-to-integrate-climate-risk-into-audits/

In June 2022, the SFOF sent an open letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission highlighting concerns around ESG disclosure rules. 

Eight objections were raised, including the allegation the rules would violate the First Amendment.  

Federated Hermes – which according to its website is “guided by our conviction that responsible investing is the best way to create wealth over the long term” – is a gold sponsor of this group.  

Criticism of this association has surfaced before and forced the asset manager to issue a statement on 18 August. 

This in part read: “We participate with the events of a variety of organisations, including the Prince of Wales Sustainable Markets Initiative, Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the Impact Investing Institute, the International Sustainability Standards Board, Focusing Capital on the Long Term, the National Association of State Treasurers and the State Financial Officers Foundation.  

“We do not set the agendas for these organisations; rather, they operate according to their unique charters and the views of their members and elected leadership. Our participation does not serve as an endorsement of any organisation’s particular perspective on any issue.” 

The statement was signed by Saker Nusseibeh and J. Christopher Donahue, the CEOs of Federated Hermes Limited and Federated Hermes, respectively.  

According to media reports, three Danish pension fund clients of Federated Hermes have continued to voice their disappointment despite this statement.  

Anders Schelde, chief investment officer at Danish pension fund AkadmikerPension said: “It doesn’t add up in our view.” 

Kristine Lund Christiansen, head of ESG at Danish pension fund P+, has asked for a “more concrete” statement from the Federated Hermes on its SFOF association. 

Likewise, a third unnamed Dutch pension fund stated it was also awaiting more information before deciding its course of action.  

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
Capitol Building

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

June 11, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas redomicile passes with high dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More