Judge throws out New York lawsuit against pension funds

5 July 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

A New York judge has dismissed a lawsuit against three pension funds in the New York City Retirement System for violating fiduciary duties.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Judge throws out New York lawsuit against pension funds

July 4th, 2024

A New York judge has dismissed a lawsuit against three pension funds in the New York City Retirement System for violating fiduciary duties.

The lawsuit claimed that the pension funds had disregarded their fiduciary duty by supporting divestment from fossil fuels, which the plaintiffs argued would lead to the funds making investment decisions based on morality rather than focusing solely on the risk and returns on the investment.

They argued that the pension plans’ investment decisions had a detrimental impact on the financial health of their retirement plans and on their plans’ ability to pay the pension benefits they owe.

However, New York State Supreme Court Judge Andrea Masley ruled that the “plaintiffs have not, and will not, suffer any monetary losses based upon defendants’ investment decisions”, Pensions & Investments reports.

Masley referenced Thole v US Bank NA in her ruling, a 2020 case in which the plaintiffs argued that the defendants breached their “duties of loyalty and prudence” by poorly managing and investing the assets of the plan.

This established that plaintiffs must demonstrate that they have suffered an injury that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent as a result of the defendants’ investment decisions in order to be eligible for compensation.

Thole v US Bank NA also involved a defined benefit pension plan in which the beneficiaries are entitled to a fixed amount each month, and therefore the plaintiffs would receive the same amount regardless of whether they win or lose this action.

In January, a group of 26 US Republican attorneys general filed an appeal in their legal challenge to a rule over pension funds’ ability to consider ESG factors when selecting investments.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

April 30, 2026
Read More

Twitter Trial: Court Ruling Raises the Governance Bar on Executive Communications

March 25, 2026
Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More

Accounting Evolution: Fewer Lawsuits but Larger and Slower

March 19, 2026
Read More

Shareholders Sue: Lawsuit Launched Over Climate Proposal Exclusion

March 6, 2026
Read More

Extinguishing ESG: US House Approves Prohibitive Bill for Pension Funds

January 20, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More