Lawsuit filed against California’s disclosure rules

7 February 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The US Chamber of Commerce has filed a lawsuit against the state of California over its new corporate climate disclosure laws.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Lawsuit filed against California’s disclosure rules

February 7th, 2024

The US Chamber of Commerce has filed a lawsuit against the state of California over its new corporate climate disclosure laws.

The new corporate disclosure laws, which were signed by California governor Gavin Newsom in October, require businesses to report on emissions across their supply chains, including indirect emissions or Scope 3 emissions.

Under the new rules, public and private companies with annual revenue exceeding $1 billion must begin disclosing their Scope 3 emissions by 2027.

The US Chamber of Commerce brought the lawsuit alongside the American Farm Bureau Federation, California Chamber of Commerce, Central Valley Business Federation, Los Angeles County Business Federation and Western Growers Association.

It argued that indirect emissions “can be nearly impossible for a company to accurately calculate”.

The lawsuit said: “The laws also require companies to subjectively report their worldwide climate-related financial risks and proposed mitigation strategies.

“The laws apply to companies across the US and worldwide on the basis of even minimal operations in the state of California, thus attempting to impose essentially a national standard.”

It argued that the laws were violating the Clean Air Act, which pre-empts a state’s ability to regulate emissions in other states.

The laws were passed ahead of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s announcement of its new national disclosure requirements, with experts arguing the laws could set a precedent for the regulator to introduce mandatory Scope 3 emission disclosures as well.

In December, it delayed the expected adoption of its final climate disclosure rules by more than a year after its initial proposed adoption timeframe of April 2024.

Related Stories

Science Based Targets initiative 2.0

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

June 18, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More