Northern Rock shareholders High Court challenge

12 June 2009

Sarah Wilson

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Former Northern Rock shareholders are challenging the UK government's nationalisation terms in the British courts claiming that the Treasury's conditions will result in little or no compensation. The case, which is expected to run for three days, is being brought by SRM Global, RAB Capital, and a group of private shareholders with the support of Legal & General, the Rock's  third-largest institutional shareholder.

The shareholders are attempting to overturn an earlier ruling against them; their argument is that the company was not worthless as the Bank of England had stepped forward with a significant funding programme for Northern Rock, something which the shareholders believe would not have happened if it was not "a going concern". When the bank was nationalised in February 2008, the Treasury instructed independent valuers to assume that "Northern Rock is unable to continue as a going concern and is in administration". Shareholders claim the wording prejudices the independent review by accountants BDO Stoy Hayward.

If the appeal is lost it is widely believed the shareholder will take their fight to the European Court of Human Rights in order to force a review the rights and obligations of shareholders and governments.

Separately the UK government is understood to be considering a sale of Northern Rock and disinvesting the taxpayers' holding in the company.

Related Stories

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

Disney Defeat: Anti-ESG Proposal Pair Perform Poorly at 2026 AGM

March 27, 2026
Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil: Redomicile, Proposal Control and the Re‑shaping of Shareholder Influence

March 13, 2026
Read More