Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association updates Corporate Governance Guidelines

18 December 2015

Editor

EU regulation

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (the Association), better known as the National Association of Pension Funds of old,  has updated its Corporate Governance Policy and Voting Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Policy and Voting Guidelines aim to  promote the long-term success of the companies in which the Association’s members invest; and, ensure that the board and management of these companies are held accountable to shareholders, such as pension funds.

There are three areas that the Association is seeking improvement on by companies and which forms the basis on which they will be considered by institutional investors. These are improving risk reporting; ensuring that directors are giving enough time to their roles and giving timely notice of the issuance of new shares without the application of pre-emption rights.

The Association believes that there should corporate reporting on the human capital of a company for investors which would include more transparency on the composition of the workforce and the sustainability of the employment model. The reporting should also include the board’s view of the associated strategic and operating risks, the Association said. The Guidelines also suggest that corporate reporting on  emerging risks, such as cyber-security and climate change, also needed improvement and companies should disclose how these risks are managed and what changes have occurred in relation to these risks in the past year.

The non-executive role is an increasingly demanding one, particularly when chairing a key committee, and is essential to the effective governance of the company, the Association said. This year’s policy and guidelines include a note that shareholders should be mindful of concurrent directorships and their respective call upon an individuals’ time.  For complex companies it may be appropriate to vote against the (re)-election of a non-executive director who holds more than four directorships.  Where a director chairs a number of key committees a stricter view may be adopted, especially where an individual is a director of two or more companies in heavily regulated industries.

Companies are allowed to issue shares for cash without the application of pre-emption rights, under Section 570 Authorities, subject to limits on the amount of shares that can be issues. The Association believes that companies should clearly signal at the earliest opportunity their intention to undertake a non-pre-emptive issue and to engage in a meaningful dialogue with their shareholders about this.  Companies should keep shareholders informed of issues related to an application to dis-apply their pre-emption rights.  In return, shareholders should review each case made by a company on its own merits and decide on each case individually, using their investment criteria, the Association said.

As in previous years, the PLSA voting guidelines will be incorporated to Manifest's research reports and voting guidelines for all UK listed companies reporting after 31-Dec-15

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ICCR urges investors to encourage company support against Rule 14a-8 rescission proposal

SHareholder meeting

Fifteen financial institutions push ISSB towards dedicated Nature Standard

SHareholder meeting

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

SHareholder meeting

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

SHareholder meeting

Tesla’s 2026 AGM sees no shareholder proposals for first time in over a decade

SHareholder meeting

Procter & Gamble shareholder rights proposals draw significant support

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 United States of America Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

US SEC Rule 14a-8 Rescission Proposal

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

IFRS Foundation reform

IFRS Foundation reform: Can smaller IASB and ISSB boards preserve representation?

October 16, 2026
Read More
ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny

ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny – stewardship claims now in scope

October 14, 2026
Read More
EU proposed budget cuts put biodiversity stewardship

EU proposed budget cuts put biodiversity stewardship and long-term risk management in focus

October 14, 2026
Read More
US SEC

US SEC warning chills investor stewardship

October 13, 2026
Read More
ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations

ASX governance reform: simplification must preserve decision-useful disclosure

September 16, 2026
Read More
UK Corporate Reporting

Accountability versus allocation: Who is corporate reporting for?

September 11, 2026
Read More