The “anti-woke” proxy war – politicians versus shareholders

29 September 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

US politicians have attacked shareholder rights in a letter to Net Zero Financial Services Providers Alliance (NZFSPA) members, a global group supporting the goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The “anti-woke” proxy war – politicians versus shareholders

September 28th, 2023

US politicians have attacked shareholder rights in a letter to Net Zero Financial Services Providers Alliance (NZFSPA) members, a global group supporting the goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti led a coalition of 22 Republican state attorneys general in warning members of NZFSPA that its coordinated commitments to net zero may violate state and federal law in the US.

Skrmetti said: “If financial service providers are colluding to limit consumer choices and manipulate market outcomes in support of international climate activists, that could violate our antitrust and consumer protection laws.”

In her response, Minerva chief executive Sarah Wilson noted that its role involves ensuring asset managers and other institutional investors are appropriately managing risks, thereby not damaging their clients’ long-term investment returns.

Wilson said: “In the UK, institutional investors are obliged to consider the risks that may likely impact portfolio returns. This includes climate change, bad business practices that may undermine trust in companies in relation to worker rights and geopolitical risks.”

As a UK company, Minerva is bound by UK law, said Wilson, which includes specific climate targets.

She added: “[Skrmetti’s] letter does not seek ‘understanding’ of anything; it is nothing less than an elaborate fishing expedition designed to waste valuable time.

“It is a poorly disguised attempt to undermine global climate change action in the service of an extreme political agenda which faces dwindling public support.”

Related Stories

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More