Asia's ESG ratings sector still developing, says OECD

21 January 2022

Elizabeth Pfeuti

ESG ratings are still in the early stages of development in the Asia Pacific region, according to a report from the OECD.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Asia's ESG ratings sector still developing, says OECD

January 21, 2022

ESG ratings are still in the early stages of development in the Asia Pacific region, according to a report from the OECD.

The Trends in ESG Investing and Quality Infrastructure Investment in Asia-Pacific report found that relatively few listed companies were making ESG disclosures, resulting in disparate returns from portfolios and presenting difficulties in analysis.

However, the ESG ratings sector was developing quickly, the OECD said, and required further work and development to improve its quality and coverage. Indeed, just last year a group of Asia-based asset owners came together to form the Asia Transition Platform, with an initial focus on carbon risk at financial institutions.

“The assessment shows that, when analysing risk-adjusted returns, different providers’ data and methodologies have a strong impact on the results,” the report stated. “This suggests that further work is needed in order to improve ESG investing and that historical returns over the past 10 years do not fully reflect the benefits of ESG integration.”

The lack of coverage meant the average market capitalisation of ESG-rated companies was lower than in more developed ESG markets such as the US. This is likely to change as the emerging market becomes more developed and ESG considerations become more commonplace.

The OECD’s research also found a low correlation between ESG fund ratings and performance. However, the organisation emphasised that this did not mean highly rated ESG funds did not outperform, but instead that outperformance could be generated regardless of ESG rating.

“This indicates that a number of other factors, such as the performance of individual fund managers relative to the benchmark, the investment strategy of the funds and its implementation, the specific asset allocation have a material impact on returns,” the OECD’s report stated.

The full report can be accessed here.

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas redomicile passes with high dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More