Charity watchdog overhauls investment guidelines

21 April 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The UK’s charities regulator has scrapped words such as “ethical” and “responsible” from its investment guidelines in a major overhaul designed to modernise its advice for non-profits.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The UK’s charities regulator has scrapped words such as “ethical” and “responsible” from its investment guidelines in a major overhaul designed to modernise its advice for non-profits. 

The Charity Commission has proposed “retiring” certain phrases that charities have said are too vague or not inclusive, as part of a wider revamp of its investment guidance. 

In a blog post outlining the changes, Paul Latham, director of communications and policy at the Charity Commission, said: “The new draft guidance instead emphasises that trustees must ensure that, ultimately, the investment approach operates for the benefit of their charity once they have considered all relevant matters.  

“In the context of financial investments, this may lead them to choose to exclude certain investments due to non-financial considerations, or to solely focus on financial return that maximises investment income to spend on their charity’s purpose.” 

The changes to the investment guidelines also serve to bring the commission’s policies in line with a recent legal ruling, known as the Butler-Sloss judgement. In this case, the UK’s High Court ruled in favour of the trustees of two charities that had excluded investments from their portfolios in order to align themselves with the Paris Agreement on climate change. 

Previous Charity Commission investment guidance was based on a much earlier case that had ruled that financial outcomes were more important than ethical considerations. 

Latham said the High Court’s ruling “offered welcome clarification of how existing legal principles should be interpreted by trustees in a modern context”.  

He added: “It confirmed that trustees have wide discretion in making investment decisions, for example, in deciding to exclude certain investments based on non-financial considerations.  

“It also confirms trustees can equally choose to focus just on financial return – ultimately what is appropriate for charities may differ. We have ensured that our updated guidance reflects that judgment.” 

The Charity Commission will be testing its new guidance with charities over the next few weeks with a view to publishing finalised guidance later this year. 

Related Stories

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More

ISSB Prepares for Final SASB Updates with New Proposals

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More

From Prudence and Loyalty to Maximum Discretion: How US Fiduciary Duty Just Changed Shape

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More