Companies struggle as US targets forced labour

28 January 2022

Elizabeth Pfeuti

A US law requiring the disclosure of links to potential forced labour could pose more supply chain issues to listed companies as investor scrutiny increases on social issues.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Companies struggle as US targets forced labour

January 28, 2022

A US law requiring the disclosure of links to potential forced labour could pose more supply chain issues to listed companies as investor scrutiny increases on social issues.

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act – part of the US Tariff Act – brands goods sourced from or produced in Xinjiang as products of forced labour. Xinjiang is home to many of China’s Uyghur and other Muslim minority populations.

From June 21 this year reports Bloomberg Law, companies will be asked to present documentation to the US Customs and Border Protection to prove that their products do not contain components sourced or manufactured in Xinjiang.

The law also adds a layer to environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns that corporate boards already face. A failure to comply with this could expose firms to increased shareholder pressure over supply chain issues.

The law was signed by President Joe Biden on 23 December last year and is aimed at putting pressure on China to end the alleged repression of its Uyghur and other Muslim minorities. China’s foreign ministry denies the allegation and claimed that the law would undermine the stability of global industrial supply chains.

The US Customs and Border Protection has prohibited several orders from entering the US in the last two years, though companies including Apple, Nike and BP America have lobbied Congress on the law, and many more firms have lobbied through trade groups.

Cullen Hendrix, a professor at the University of Denver’s Korbel School of International Studies told Bloomberg Law that the new rule, which takes effect in June, was “an incredibly high bar, if not an impossibly high bar to meet”.

However, Rachel Albert, co-chair of law firm Jenner & Block’s National Security, Sanctions and Export Controls Practice, said the move could increase the information that companies disclose as material risks for investors.

Related Stories

TISFD Disclosure

What the TISFD draft tells us about where disclosure is heading

May 28, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More

Extinguishing ESG: US House Approves Prohibitive Bill for Pension Funds

January 20, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Sustainability Accountability: ESMA Adds Guidance to Avoid Greenwashing Risks

January 16, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Anti-DEI Drive: Trump’s DOJ Wields Fraud Law to Dissuade Companies

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

White House Targets Proxy Advisors: Washington Puts Voting ‘Plumbing’ on Notice

December 18, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More