Consumer groups call for higher bar for ESG funds

11 March 2022

Elizabeth Pfeuti

A group of 6 NGOs have called for higher standards for sustainable investment funds under the EU's SFDR articles 8 & 9.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Consumer groups call for higher bar for ESG funds

March 11, 2022

A group of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have called for higher standards for sustainable investment funds under the EU's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

In a paper published in late February, the six organisations recommended minimum standards for funds classified as Article 8 or 9 products, as well as broadening the scope of the relevant sections of the SFDR to "include all financial products".

The paper was jointly published by European consumer body BEUC, think tank E3G, campaign group ShareAction, the World Wildlife Fund, and NGOs Transport & Environment and Finance Watch.

It set out six core recommendations, including the development and adoption of "minimum criteria" for both Article 8 and 9 funds "to match the ambition of EU sustainability-related goals and ensure a well-calibrated regulatory framework". These criteria should apply to "all financial instruments", the paper said.

Such criteria, the organisations said, should include minimum sustainability performance, engagement and stewardship requirements, exclusions, information about the types of security, and "their capacity to effectively allocate capital to the real economy".

As well as the minimum requirements, the paper called for "appropriate disclosures" to allow investors to verify each product's credentials, and for the rules to be aligned with other EU finance legislation such as MiFID II and the Insurance Distribution Directive.

Finally, the paper called for the roles of the EU and national regulators to be strengthened, to help them identify, tackle and reduce greenwashing.

Under the SFDR, funds classified as Article 8 - also dubbed 'light green' funds - are those that promote environmental or social characteristics "provided that the companies in which the investments are made follow good governance practices". The regulation includes sustainability risk indicators that are expected to be integrated into a fund's strategy in order to obtain Article 8 status.

Meanwhile, Article 9 funds are defined as those that have specific sustainable investment or carbon emission reductions as part of their core objective.

Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly news updates:

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
Capitol Building

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

June 11, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas redomicile passes with high dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More