Mining giant Rio Tinto loses investor votes in AGM

15 April 2022

Liz Pfeuti

Rio Tinto is under fire from investors following a lack of clarity about climate change risks, questionable audit committee performances, and reports of sexual harassment and bullying.

Latest News

Minerva Proxy Update

EU Parliament signals more enforceable path for SFDR 2.0

Minerva Proxy Update

From Stewardship Silos to Systems Thinking

US state attorneys general escalate ESG pressure on credit ratings agencies

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Mining giant Rio Tinto loses investor votes in AGM

April 15, 2022

Rio Tinto is under fire from investors following a lack of clarity about climate change risks, questionable audit committee performances, and reports of sexual harassment and bullying.

Investors have voted against the financial statements of Rio Tinto, the world's second-largest metals and mining corporation, over a lack of clarity about climate change risks and the audit committee's questionable performance.

Ahead of the vote at Rio Tinto�s annual general meeting (AGM) on 8 April 2022, investment management firm Sarasin & Partners declared its intention to vote against the company�s financial statement due to a lack of disclosure on 1.5�C resilience.

Sarasin & Partners also voted against keeping KPMG as auditor, with the firm�s head of stewardship Natasha Landell-Mills noting that �KMPG provides commentary on climate considerations but provides no disclosure as to how it has tested consistency with a 1.5�C pathway, or the emission targets set by the firm�.

In the A100+ Climate Accounting and Audit Assessment � 2022 Update, it was noted there were �significant reporting concerns over which the Audit Committee (AC) has responsibility on behalf of the board � both the financial statements and the audit�.

It also highlighted: �The AC also explicitly confirms that the 'central case' assumptions used in the financial statements 'is not aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement'.�

Meanwhile, the investment manager abrdn abstained from approving Rio Tinto�s reports and accounts following a report that exposed sexual harassment, bullying and racism, according to media reports.

This follows publication of the Broderick Report which concluded that bullying at Rio Tinto is systemic, sexual harassment and everyday sexism occur at unacceptable rates and racism is common across a number of areas.

ESG Clarity reported that Andrew Mason, abrdn stewardship director, said: �In light of the nature, severity and systemic impacts of the issues raised, we have decided to abstain from our vote to approve the company�s reports and accounts. If we do not see progress against the milestones set by the company, we will take further actions.�

The results of the AGM will not be fully disclosed until after an AGM takes place in Melbourne on 5 May.

Minerva covered these Rio Tinto developments extensively in our Minerva Briefing released in March. Watch a summary of the Briefing or download the full document.

Related Stories

No items found.