New US coalition demands right to invest responsibly

12 April 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

A coalition of more than 300 investors and companies has urged US policymakers to protect their freedom to invest responsibly.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

New US coalition demands right to invest responsibly 

April 13, 2023

A coalition of more than 300 investors and companies has urged US policymakers to protect their freedom to invest responsibly. 

The ‘Freedom to Invest’ coalition produced a statement arguing that investors must be free to consider all material financial risks and opportunities, including those related to climate change. 

The newly formed coalition was coordinated by the We Mean Business Coalition and Ceres, which is a non-profit focused on sustainability challenges in capital markets. 

The list of more than 300 signatories includes Franklin Templeton, which manages $1.5trn of assets, and California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the second-largest pension fund in the United States.  

The statement was produced to remind policymakers that introducing policies to limit responsible investing can be detrimental to the profitability of businesses.  

The signatories also highlighted the important role that considering climate-related risks plays in building a stronger and more resilient economy.  

The statement said: “Neglecting the robust economic benefits of the clean energy economy — and the substantial public and private investment opportunities that are necessary to achieve this shift — would represent a failure to build a stronger, more resilient U.S. economy.” 

As a result, policymakers must not prevent investors and businesses from considering all material financial risks, including the economic impact of the climate crisis, according to Freedom to Invest. 

The coalition also reiterated that the consideration of ESG factors is not political or ideological. 

The statement follows debates over whether investment decisions should be allowed to consider climate change and ESG factors, which was prompted by the Department of Labor’s new ESG rule. 

The rule was first introduced in November to allow plan fiduciaries to consider climate change in selecting investments. However, lawmakers approved a resolution to overturn the rule in March.  

Later in March, US President Joe Biden issued his first veto on the bill to invalidate the ESG rule. 

Related Stories

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

US state attorneys general escalate ESG pressure on credit ratings agencies

April 30, 2026
Read More

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

April 30, 2026
Read More
Shell

Shell Faces Renewed Legal Pressure Over Future Oil and Gas Investment

April 23, 2026
Read More
fiduciary squeeze

The fiduciary squeeze is timed for when trustees can’t look up

April 23, 2026
Read More