Oklahoma advances amendments to controversial anti-ESG law

5 March 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The Oklahoma legislature has advanced two bills to amend its anti-ESG law, which introduces regulations for state pension systems considering ESG factors in investment decisions.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Oklahoma advances amendments to controversial anti-ESG law

March 5th, 2024

The Oklahoma legislature has advanced two bills to amend its anti-ESG law, which introduces regulations for state pension systems considering ESG factors in investment decisions.

Oklahoma’s Energy Discrimination Elimination Act prohibits state pension funds from investing in firms such as asset managers that use ESG criteria in their investment decision-making, but allows funds to take a fiduciary exemption if divesting from those blacklisted firms goes against their fiduciary responsibility.

The Senate Bill was advanced by the General Government Committee, which requires the state treasurer to obtain the opinion of the attorney general when the treasurer and state pension systems disagree over an exemption, Pensions & Investments reports.

The advancement of the bill follows a months-long battle between Oklahoma state treasurer Todd Russ and the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) after Russ challenged the fund’s decision to take an exemption back in August.

The OPERS board voted in favour of taking the exemption and argued that conforming to the rule would be inconsistent with its fiduciary responsibility. The rule would have seen the fund divest around $6.8 billion from blacklisted firms, including BlackRock and State Street, due to their ties to climate groups such as the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative.

The House Bill was also advanced by the Banking, Financial Services and Pensions Committee in the same week. The bill would narrow the exemptions available to public pension funds and require funds seeking an exemption to illustrate how divesting from blacklisted firms would result in financial losses.

The bill would also broaden its anti-ESG stance to include timber, mining and agriculture industries as well as oil and gas.

Anti-ESG sentiment has been on the rise in the US for several years, and this month Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) CEO Nicolai Tangen warned it could spread to Europe.

Related Stories

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

April 30, 2026
Read More
Shell

Shell Faces Renewed Legal Pressure Over Future Oil and Gas Investment

April 23, 2026
Read More
fiduciary squeeze

The fiduciary squeeze is timed for when trustees can’t look up

April 23, 2026
Read More

From Prudence and Loyalty to Maximum Discretion: How US Fiduciary Duty Just Changed Shape

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More

Disney Defeat: Anti-ESG Proposal Pair Perform Poorly at 2026 AGM

March 27, 2026
Read More