Pensions not protecting people from climate-related financial risk

2 February 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Pensions funds are failing to protect their beneficiaries from climate-related financial risk, according to a new report by Sierra Club, Stand.earth, and Stop the Money Pipeline.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Pensions not protecting people from climate-related financial risk

February 2nd, 2024

Pensions funds are failing to protect their beneficiaries from climate-related financial risk, according to a new report by Sierra Club, Stand.earth, and Stop the Money Pipeline.

The report, ‘The Hidden Risk in State Pensions: Analyzing State Pensions’ Responses to the Climate Crisis in Proxy Voting’, analyses proxy voting records, proxy guidelines, and voting transparency of public pensions of 24 public funds collectively representing more than $2 trillion in assets under management.

The report found that public pensions are failing to take the necessary steps to tackle the climate crisis and reduce climate-related financial risk, which it said places the savings of millions of beneficiaries at risk.

It assessed the funds’ proxy voting guidelines based on their strength on addressing climate- and environment-related financial risks. In the evaluation, none of the funds received an A grade rating for their proxy voting guidelines.

The report also evaluated pension funds on their voting records on a set of climate-related votes at financial institutions in 2023, and how easily accessible data on voting records and proxy voting guidelines are.

On proxy voting records, four state pension systems based in Massachusetts, Oregon, and California, and all of New York City’s five pension systems received A grades and on data transparency 13 pension systems received A+ grades.

All the funds analysed were based in states that are a member of For the Long Term, a network that advocates for more sustainable, just, and inclusive firms and markets, including New York, California and Connecticut.

The report recommended the funds strengthen their proxy voting guidelines and use those to direct their voting practices in 2024 and beyond.

The report said: “Pensions are both universal owners and long-term owners. Given this, pension funds are some of the institutions most exposed to systemic financial risks, such as those posed by the climate crisis and biodiversity loss and must therefore adapt their investment and stewardship strategies to meet their fiduciary obligations in light of these emerging risks.”

Related Stories

Science Based Targets initiative 2.0

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

June 18, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More
Research and Proxy Voting

Minerva Proxy Update

May 22, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

From Stewardship Silos to Systems Thinking

May 1, 2026
Read More