SEC and ASIC crack down on greenwashing

16 August 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

The Australian and US national financial regulators are taking legal action against companies accused of greenwashing funds and misleading investors.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

SEC and ASIC crack down on greenwashing

August 16th, 2023

The Australian and US national financial regulators are taking legal action against companies accused of greenwashing funds and misleading investors.

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have both commenced proceedings against companies relating to their ESG investment marketing.

SEC lawyers have sent document requests, including subpoenas, to several asset managers. It is investigating a range of areas, including conventional funds that have been retooled as ESG funds, according to the Financial Times.

The move follows the SEC establishing, in March 2021, the Climate and ESG Task Force to identify ESG-related misconduct.

This will be the first ESG case from the taskforce, led by Kelly L. Gibson, the acting deputy director of enforcement in 2023, following major cases against BNY Mellon Investment Adviser and Goldman Sachs Asset Management in 2022.

The SEC has not revealed which asset managers have received requests and declined to comment.

Similarly, the ASIC has commenced civil penalty proceedings against Active Super, a superannuation fund with approximately AUD $13.5bn in superannuation assets, for misrepresenting its funds.

Active Super claimed that it eliminated investments that posed too great a risk to the environment and the community, such as tobacco manufacturing, oil tar sands and gambling, and that it had added Russia to their list of excluded countries, following its invasion of Ukraine.

However, the ASIC alleges that between 2021 and 2023 Active Super held 28 holdings, either directly or indirectly, which exposed members to securities it claimed to restrict. These included Gazprom PJSC and Rosneft Oil Company, both Russian entities, and several gambling companies including Skycity Entertainment Group Limited and PointsBet Holdings Limited.

ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said: “When making claims super funds must have evidence to back their claims and ensure they are not promising exclusions that they cannot guarantee.”

This is ASIC’s third greenwashing civil penalty proceeding, and comes just one month after the regulator filed a lawsuit against Vanguard’s Australian entity for not applying appropriate ESG filters on some of its supposedly ethical funds.

Related Stories

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More
fiduciary squeeze

The fiduciary squeeze is timed for when trustees can’t look up

April 23, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More