Shareholders Vote Against Key ESG Proposals�

10 June 2024

Shareholders at both McDonald�s and Exxon Mobil have voted against key ESG-related proposals at recent annual general meetings, despite prominent campaigns by institutional investors.

Latest News

Minerva Proxy Update

EU Parliament signals more enforceable path for SFDR 2.0

Minerva Proxy Update

From Stewardship Silos to Systems Thinking

US state attorneys general escalate ESG pressure on credit ratings agencies

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Shareholders Vote Against Key ESG Proposals 

June 6, 2024

Shareholders at both McDonald�s and Exxon Mobil have voted against key ESG-related proposals at recent annual general meetings, despite prominent campaigns by institutional investors.

A resolution aimed at curbing the use of antibiotics in its meat production failed to pass at McDonald�s AGM on May 24, with only 15% of shareholders voting in favour.

The resolution called for McDonald�s to adopt a policy phasing out the use of antibiotics in its beef and pork. McDonald�s is one of the largest purchasers of meat in the world and relies on antibiotics to prevent and treat bacterial infections in livestock.

The process has been linked to antibiotic resistance, which is recognised as a global health crisis by the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Institutional investors had vocally backed the McDonald�s proposal, with LGIM and Schroders expressing support, while a survey from PensionBee conducted shortly before the vote found nearly three-quarters (74%) of pension savers supported the resolution.

Despite these concerns, support for the resolution had declined since last year, when a similar resolution was proposed and achieved 17% approval.

Just a few days after McDonald�s AGM, Exxon Mobil�s shareholders also voted overwhelmingly in line with the board�s recommendations, rejecting several ESG-related proposals.

Major institutional investors like CalPERS, the largest public pension fund in the US, had urged shareholders to vote against all Exxon directors, criticising the company�s lawsuit against climate activist shareholders.

But on June 29, Exxon�s board was re-elected with an average of 95% support. Notably, 98% of shareholders also voted against a proposal to revisit executive pay incentives for greenhouse gas emission reductions, and large majorities also voted down proposals for reports on social impact (92%), gender and race pay gaps (80%) and plastic production (79%).

The votes highlighted the ongoing challenge of aligning shareholder actions with ESG action, even as institutional investors continue to push for stronger sustainability practices.

Minerva�s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship.

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

No items found.