US Republicans file lawsuit over ERISA ESG rule

26 January 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

A group of 26 US Republican attorneys general filed an appeal in their legal challenge to a rule over pension funds’ ability to consider ESG factors when selecting investments.
EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

US Republicans file lawsuit over ERISA ESG rule

January 26th, 2024

A group of 26 US Republican attorneys general filed an appeal in their legal challenge to a rule over pension funds’ ability to consider ESG factors when selecting investments.

The lawsuit was first filed in January 2023 over the Department of Labor’s rule, Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights, an amendment to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which allows retirement plans fiduciaries to consider ESG factors when making investment decisions.

The lawsuit argued the rule undermines key protections for retirement savers, oversteps the department’s authority under ERISA and is arbitrary and cannot be applied consistently.

In September, a judge ruled in favour of the Labor Department that the rule was fair and within the department’s remit, but the attorneys general have now filed an appeal with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to review the decision, Pensions and Investment reports.

The appeal focuses on the rule’s tiebreakers standard, which allows fiduciaries to consider ESG factors when deciding between two investments where both options would serve the plan’s economic interests equally well, plan fiduciaries can use ESG considerations as the deciding factor.

The attorneys general argued the standard violates ERISA, which requires fiduciaries to solely provide financial benefits to plan participants.

Republican states including North Carolina introduced new laws last year to prohibit state agencies and state pension plan fiduciaries from considering ESG measures when making investment decisions.

Similarly, Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed an anti-ESG bill last April requiring the Florida State Board of Administration to make investment decisions based “solely on pecuniary factors”.

Related Stories

Judge rules American Airlines unlawfully considered ESG factors in 401(k) plan

January 16, 2025

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

Republican attorneys claim asset managers are breaching fiduciary duties

September 6, 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

Oklahoma advances amendments to controversial anti-ESG law

March 5, 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

CFA Institute: How to take the next steps in ESG integration

December 7, 2020

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

Global standard-setters unite on sustainability reporting

September 14, 2020

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

US regulators seek to untangle ESG duty as UK pushes ahead

July 3, 2020

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More