ACCR cuts ties with Rio Tinto after anti-climate lobbying

1 August 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

ACCR cuts ties with Rio Tinto after anti-climate lobbying

August 1st, 2024

The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) has disengaged with mining company Rio Tinto following negative advocacy.

ACCR announced it would no longer work with the company to improve its climate-related lobbying after the firm lobbied the Australian government to reduce climate disclosure requirements.

ACCR has been working with Rio Tinto since July 2023 to support the company in its pledge to positive climate advocacy.

However, ACCR said it was recently revealed that the company was a signatory on a letter to the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, written earlier this year, asking him to “personally intervene” on pending reforms to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).

The letter requested that the Prime Minister remove a proposed new object in the act that would require climate change and greenhouse gas emissions be considered when assessing new projects.

The letter was only made publicly available after a freedom of information (FOI) request by Greenpeace Australia.

It claims that the proposed rule changes would duplicate existing requirements and “establish a direct pathway for duplication of other requirements”.

Naomi Hogan, company strategy lead at ACCR, said: “ACCR views Rio Tinto’s heavy-handed advocacy to the Prime Minister to be inconsistent with the company’s own commitments for enhanced climate advocacy and transparency.

“Claiming that a climate trigger is duplicative with the Safeguard Mechanism is willful misinterpretation at its best. Rio Tinto and the Business Council of Australia are well aware that, unlike potential emissions considerations in federal assessments, the Safeguard Mechanism was never designed to assess the lifecycle climate change impacts of proposed coal and gas projects.”

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More