AIM: Hidden director payments at Real Food Company

6 August 2017

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

AIM-listed Real Good Food has admitted to not disclosing payments to directors in its related parties transaction notes within its annual reports for three financial years from 2014 to 2016.

These notes should have revealed the payment of consultancy fees to two of its directors - its executive chairman, Pieter Totté and a non-executive director, Peter Salter. The company said these fees are believed to amount to £250,000 to Totté and £25,000 to Salter in FY 2014, £358,000 and £20,000 respectively in FY 2015 and £1.21 million to Totté in FY 2016. Following the announcement by the company Salter resigned as a non-executive director and a member of its board.

Real Good Food was formed by Totté in 2003 and was listed on AIM in September that year. The company has three divisions cake decorating, food ingredients and premium bakery and within them owns long-standing food brands such as Renshaws, R&W Scott and Haydens.

The company has been criticised by corporate governance experts because Totté having begun as a non-executive chairman has been executive chairman since 2009 and as the company has no chief executive effectively acts as a combined chairman and chief executive in this role. The board comprises of Totté, David Newman, the finance director and company secretary and, since Salter's departure, three non-executive directors all of whom are men.

As AIM-listed companies are not listed on the main market they are not subject to the full UK corporate governance code but are encouraged to comply with the corporate governance guide developed by the Quoted Companies Alliance. There is also a role for the company's Nominated Adviser (NOMAD) in ensuring companies have appropriate governance frameworks.

In its recently published discussion paper on the AIM rules the London Stock Exchange emphasised the importance of good board composition. The paper also asked for feedback on whether in future AIM-listed companies should be required to report annually against a governance code and whether the current corporate governance role of the NOMAD is actually effective. The deadline for responses on this consultation is 8th September and they can be sent to aimnotices@lseg.com.

Related Stories

Consultation Showcases Support for UK Voluntary Sustainability Disclosure

February 3, 2026
Read More

AI Answerability: US Bipartisan Bill Targets Corporate Job Loss Disclosure

November 18, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Streamlining Sustainability: UK FCA Moves to “Simplify” Disclosure Requirements

August 13, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Going Nuclear: Japan’s Electric Giants Face Shareholder Pressure

June 13, 2025

Editor

Read More

Netflix AGM Shock: Shareholders Vote Out Lead Director

June 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Southwest dismisses shareholder proposal as an attempt to “maximise disruption”

October 18, 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More