Asian Spotlight: Investors urged to oppose Hong Kong dual class share structure plans

16 March 2018

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) and the Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA) are urging institutional investors to respond to the latest consultation from the Hong Kong stock exchange which proposed allowing certain companies with dual-class share structures to list. The proposals form part of the stock exchanges aspiration to be a more attractive place to list for growth companies.

The ICGN and the ACGA, however, have already voiced their opposition to such changes in previous consultations and in articles and will do so again and have urged investors to add their voice.  The ICGN said ownership structures that allow disproportionate control via voting rights over publicly listed companies relative to economic interests and investment risk were a backward step for good governance, as they can lead to entrenchment of control and an erosion of accountability to minority shareholders. The group added that it advocated the importance of equal voting rights for all shareholders and called for disclosure and explanation of any divergences as well as commensurate extra protections for minority shareholders.

In this latest consultation, following its plans published last December, the Hong Kong stock exchange set out proposals to expand the existing listing regime to facilitate the listing of companies from emerging and innovative sectors, in particular, biotech companies. The exchange said it  believed that the “one-share, one vote” principle continued to be the optimum method of empowering shareholders and aligning their interests in a company."

However, the exchange added that its main objective to expand the listing regime to allow weighted voted rights (WVR) structures was to attract good quality and high growth companies from innovative sectors to list in Hong Kong. Consequently, the exchange said it would consider all circumstances in exercising its discretion to find an applicant suitable to list with a WVR structure and "would do so only in appropriate cases where the applicant fits the profile of companies targeted by the proposed regime."

The deadline for responses to the consultation is 23rd March 2018.

Financial Services Agency's Council of Experts develops guidance to facilitate engagement between issuers and investors

The Financial Services Agency's Council of Experts, appointed to advise on Japan's corporate governance and stewardship codes, has developed guidelines for engagement between companies and investors. These are still under discussion by the council but provide a framework for investors to ask questions relating to the rules of the code.

Related Stories

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

BP’s Climate Block Brings Investor Backlash

April 8, 2026
Read More

Proposal Exclusion Escalation: BP Issued “Legal Ultimatum” Over Rejected Resolution

March 27, 2026
Read More

Disney Defeat: Anti-ESG Proposal Pair Perform Poorly at 2026 AGM

March 27, 2026
Read More