Board Diversity: SEC Clarifies Reg S-K Disclosures

15 February 2019

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Board Diversity: SEC Clarifies Reg S-K Disclosures

The staff of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued two new Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations (116.11 & 133.13) focussing on how companies should consider board diversity in their Regulation S-K disclosures. The interpretations clarify when “self-identified diversity attributes” of directors and director nominees should be disclosed in public filings

Key Takeaways

Staff have stated that they expect companies to identify diversity characteristics and how they were considered in the nomination process. Diversity characteristics “such as their race, gender, ethnicity, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, or cultural background” should be disclosed, together with “any other qualifications its diversity policy takes into account, such as diverse work experiences, military service, or socio-economic or demographic characteristics.” 

  • The Guidance applies to proxy statements or other SEC filings in respect of diversity characteristics of board members or nominees.
  • Disclosure is limited to diversity characteristics that the individual self-identifies by and that are considered by the board or nomination committee.
  • Disclosure only applies if the nominee has consented to the disclosure of those characteristics.

The new guidance comes not long after the introduction of a new bill in both house of US Congress: Improving Corporate Governance Through Diversity Act of 2019  (H.R. 1018S. 360). If successful the bill would require public companies to disclose the gender, race, ethnicity and veteran status of their directors, director nominees and senior executive officers on an annual basis. At the state level, the governor of California signed legislation into law in 2018 that requires public companies headquartered in California to have at least one female director by December 2019. By the end of July 2021, a minimum of two women must sit on boards with five members, and there must be at least three women on boards with six or more members. Companies that fail to comply face fines of $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for a second or subsequent violation.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Texas Presses FTC, Attorney General on Anti-proxy Advisor Action

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Analytics Backs FRC Revisions to UK Audit and Assurance Standards

SHareholder meeting

Japan Targets Toughened Shareholder Proposal Threshold

SHareholder meeting

APAC Corporate Governance Reforms: Japan and Australia Shift Focus to Governance Effectiveness

SHareholder meeting

Paramount Shareholder Lawsuit Casts Governance Spotlight on Warner Bros Merger

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Maintains UK Stewardship Code Signatory

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Related Stories

APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC Corporate Governance Reforms: Japan and Australia Shift Focus to Governance Effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: Simplification, but at What Cost for Investor Protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas Redomicile Passes with High Dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM Votes: Governance Opacity, Not Just Protest

April 24, 2026
Read More