BP reduces CEO remuneration and proposes a simpler pay policy

6 April 2017

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Oil giant BP, which last year lost its advisory vote on its remuneration report at its AGM,  has reduced the pay of its chief executive, Bob Dudley, and will propose a simpler pay policy to shareholders at this year's meeting on 17th May.

BP disclosed in its annual report published this week that Dudley’s total remuneration for 2016 was $11.6 million, 40% lower than he received for 2015.

The company stated: "In reaching their final decisions, BP’s remuneration committee considered results from the current remuneration policy alongside outcomes for shareholders, and exercised downward discretion. This use of discretion reduced Bob Dudley’s 2016 remuneration by $2.2 million."

Last year's  59% vote against BP's remuneration report was primarily a reaction to the potentially high pay that Dudley could receive particularly set against recent poor financial performance. After the AGM last year the company said it would engage with shareholders when it designed its new remuneration policy.

Professor Dame Ann Dowling, chair of the remuneration committee, said: “After a thorough review and extensive shareholder engagement, we believe the new policy is simpler, more transparent and has strategic focus.

BP said that its proposed remuneration policy, which will be subject to a binding vote at this year's AGM is designed to be simpler and more transparent. The company added that is aims to more  clearly link pay to shareholder outcomes and delivery of BP’s strategy, and to lead to lower levels of reward.

The policy includes a lower ‘on-target’ annual bonus, more challenging stretch targets to achieve maximum annual bonus, and material reductions in the maximum longer-term incentives available to executive directors.

As a result of these changes, BP said that the maximum potential opportunity for the chief executive will be reduced by $3.7 million, and achieving this maximum will also be significantly more challenging.

As the Financial Times (FT) reported last week shareholders are expected to be tough on companies this year in their votes on pay with two-thirds of FTSE companies having to put their remuneration policies to the vote as well as their reports. Like BP others companies, the FT reported, have changed their pay for their chief executives. These include Reckitt Benkiser, Thomas Cook and Imperial brands.

Data from Manifest used by the FT showed that last year 3% of FTSE 100 companies suffered shareholder revolts where more than half of shareholders refused to support the remuneration report. This was the highest level in four years.

Related Stories

Executive Pay Upset: Trump Proposes U$5m Defence Sector Remuneration Cap

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Succession Plan Scrutiny: AMF Explores Succession Planning Governance Risks

December 17, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Income “Insanity”: Sanders Lambasts Tesla CEO Musk’s U$1tn Pay Package

December 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Tesla Trillion: Shareholders Approve Musk’s Significant CEO Pay Award

November 7, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Patching Proxy Plumbing: CII Urges SEC to Improve Voting Transparency

October 31, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Musk Malcontent: Tesla CEO’s Pay Package Pushback Intensifies

October 29, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More