Congressional Democrats criticise banks for exiting climate coalitions

23 May 2025

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Congressional Democrats criticise banks for exiting climate coalitions

May 23, 2025

A group of forty Congressional Democrats have written to the CEOs of financial institutions that have recently withdrawn from previous climate change commitments, criticising the move.

In their letter to companies such as JP Morgan Chase, BlackRock, and Goldman Sachs, lawmakers criticised them for pulling out of several global coalitions dedicated to combatting climate change.

They emphasised that the decision is particularly troubling given the worsening effects of climate change in the US, noting that 2024 was the hottest year on record and saw a rise in the frequency and severity of natural disasters, resulting in billions of dollars in damage.

“Ignoring climate change’s destabilising effects on the economy is not an option,” wrote the lawmakers. “It bears repeating that climate risk is financial risk, a fact acknowledged by investors, asset managers, businesses, and regulators, including many of your organisations.”

The lawmakers also warned that ignoring climate commitments will heighten financial risks, which in turn could directly influence how investors choose to allocate their capital.

The letter added: “Financial institutions contribute to the emissions of nearly every business sector, making your organisation a crucial player in limiting the average global temperature rise and seizing the economic opportunities presented by the transition to a low-carbon economy,”

“Moreover, as top financiers of fossil fuels, a failure to address financed emissions could expose banks to long-term climate impacts, including the risk of stranded assets.”

However, pressure on financial companies to reaffirm their climate commitments isn’t coming from lawmakers alone as shareholders are also demanding action.

For example, a ‘Say on Climate’ proposal was presented at the annual general meetings of all six major Canadian banks. The Mouvement d’éducation et de défense des actionnaires called on the banks to adopt an annual advisory vote on their environmental and climate action plans and objectives, aiming to ensure greater accountability.

In Finland, Nordea Bank also received a proposal requesting it to amend its Articles of Association to prohibit fossil fuel financing for companies without a credible transition plan aligned with the Paris Agreement.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

You can read more of our articles by clicking here.

Related Stories

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More