Disqualifications of James Hardie directors overturned

17 December 2010

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

The NSW Court of Appeal has overturned the decision of the NSW Supreme Court in respect of seven directors who had received bans on serving as directors. The Supreme Court had found that they had breached their duties to the company (James Hardie)  in 2001 over a misleading media release about asbestos compensation.

The Court of Appeal determined that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC") failed to prove that the directors had considered or approved a 2001 draft media release saying a new compensation trust would be ''fully funded''. Three years subsequent to that announcement, it emerged that the trust was in fact underfunded by some A$1.5bn.

As a result of the unanimous Court of Appeal decision, the five year disqualifications and fines handed out to seven former non-executive directors will now not apply. It will also reconsider the bans and fines originally imposed on Peter Shafron (former General Counsel) and Phillip Morley (former CFO). Former CEO Peter MacDonald did not appeal his 15 year disqualification.

The Court of Appeal based its decision on the failure of the ASIC to call as a witness a former partner of one of James Hardie's lawyers who had advised on the setting up of the trust.

However, in a separate decision, the company lost it's appeal against the Supreme Court's ruling that it had breached the Corporations Act by issuing "materially misleading" statements and had made a "flagrant" breach of its continuous disclosure obligations. The Court of Appeal judgment noted that there "could be no doubt about the misleading nature" of the announcement.

Further Reading

Hellicar's board ban overturned - Business Day

Court overturns bans on James Hardie directors - Business Day

The text of the decision is expected to be posted in due course.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Accountability Versus Allocation: Who Is Corporate Reporting For?

SHareholder meeting

SFDR Review Moves Forward, But Key Questions Remain for Investors

SHareholder meeting

German governance code reform: Minerva supports simplification, but draws a line at investor visibility

SHareholder meeting

FRC’s new regulatory approach signals a shift from rule-making to market stewardship

SHareholder meeting

Shein lists in Hong Kong at reduced valuation after protracted IPO journey

SHareholder meeting

SEC sends executive pay disclosure overhaul to White House for review

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

August 27, 2026
Read More
APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC corporate governance reforms: Japan and Australia shift focus to governance effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More
Proxy Voting Review 2026

Minerva proxy update: Governance reforms, vote no campaigns and AGM results

July 3, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More

Starbucks’ Shareholder Showdown: Investors Issue ‘Vote No’ Campaign Against Director Duo

February 23, 2026
Read More

Remuneration Retraction: ANZ Bonuses Pulled Amid Misconduct Scandal

November 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More