Executive Payouts – An Increasingly Large Frictional Cost in Mergers

5 March 2010

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Mergers frequently result in large one-time payouts to executives of the acquired company, through change-in-control payments and acceleration of equity awards. Several recent mergers, however, have highlighted how significant those deferred costs can be for shareholders.

Executives at oilfield-services company BJ Services, which is being acquired Baker Hughes in a cash-and-stock deal worth $5.3 billion on the date of announcement, will receive payouts worth approximately 4.5% of the deal’s value – including change-in-control payments of $180 million, and accelerated vesting of equity grants worth another $55 million. The merger consideration carried a one-day premium of 16.7% – and over the one-year period preceding the announcement, a premium of 33.3% – making it unlikely shareholders will reject the transaction at the March 19 special meeting despite the relatively high payouts to executives. Longer-term shareholders, however, were not particularly well-served: the merger consideration represented discounts of 22.2% and 42.6%, respectively, over the three-year and five-year periods preceding the merger announcement.

For shareholders at Black & Decker, which is being acquired by Stanley Works in an all-stock transaction worth $3.6 billion at announcement, the merger consideration also represented a premium to the one-day (22.1%) and one-year (55.9%) share prices, but a discount over the preceding three-year (8.6%) and five-year (19.3%) periods. Shareholders will vote on the transaction March 12. Executives will nonetheless receive merger-related payouts representing 4.3% of the transaction value, including $92.3 million in change-in-control payments and $59.6 million in accelerated vesting of equity grants.

These estimated payouts, however, exclude any payments to Black & Decker CEO Nolan Archibald, who late in the negotiation process acceded to a request from his independent directors to forego both his change-in-control payment and acceleration of his equity award vesting. By that point in the process, Archibald had already negotiated a post-merger role as executive chairman of the combined company, with an annual compensation of approximately $10 million, and from which he cannot be removed without the approval of 80% of the remaining directors. Archibald also receives a sign-on grant of 1 million options, for which the company did not provide a valuation, which will vest on the third anniversary of the merger. On that date Archibald will also receive a special “cost synergies” bonus of up to $45 million – plus interest at 4.5% per year – tied to the annual ongoing value of cost savings the combined company has realized. Even before accounting for interest payments, the bonus represents between 7% and 13% of the targeted cost synergies.

For more information contact Allie Monaco at PROXY Governance Inc

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ASX governance reform: simplification must preserve decision-useful disclosure

SHareholder meeting

Accountability Versus Allocation: Who Is Corporate Reporting For?

SHareholder meeting

SFDR Review Moves Forward, But Key Questions Remain for Investors

SHareholder meeting

German governance code reform: Minerva supports simplification, but draws a line at investor visibility

SHareholder meeting

FRC’s new regulatory approach signals a shift from rule-making to market stewardship

SHareholder meeting

Shein lists in Hong Kong at reduced valuation after protracted IPO journey

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Tesla Trillion: Shareholders Approve Musk’s Significant CEO Pay Award

November 7, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Kier Group: Shareholders oppose to remuneration policy

November 16, 2018

Editor

Read More

High Pay Centre's Fat Cat Day highlights pay gap between UK CEOs and staff

January 5, 2018

Editor

Read More

GVC Holdings shareholders vote heavily against remuneration report

June 23, 2017

Editor

Read More

Morrisons: Remuneration report vote passed narrowly

June 16, 2017

Editor

Read More

US pension funds urge for opposition vote at Mylan over executive pay

June 16, 2017

Editor

Read More