ExxonMobil vows further legal action against activists misusing proxy processes

18 September 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

ExxonMobil vows further legal action against activists misusing proxy processes

September 18th, 2024

ExxonMobil has defended its legal action against shareholders, pledging to continue doing so to ensure that shareholder resolution processes are used responsibly and without causing harm.

Speaking to the Council of Institutional Investors in New York, Woods warned that Exxon Mobil is prepared to take further legal action if shareholders “abuse” the proxy proposal process again.

The move follows ExxonMobil’s lawsuit against activist investment firms Arjuna Capital and Follow This for submitting a proposal urging the oil giant to accelerate its emissions reduction plans.

In the complaint, ExxonMobil argued that the proposal would “diminish the company’s existing business” and claimed that shareholder proposal and proxy voting processes have become “ripe for abuse by activists.”

The lawsuit was ultimately dismissed by US District Court Judge Mark Pittman, who ruled that ExxonMobil’s claim was moot and dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice.

The legal action faced criticism from some institutional investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, which argued that ExxonMobil’s actions threatened to weaken shareholder rights and stifle debate.

Despite claims that ExxonMobil had been “unusually aggressive” when handling shareholder activism cases, CEO Darren Woods dismissed such assertions as ExxonMobil was simply following the established rules and processes.

He further defended ExxonMobil’s lawsuit, describing the activist proposals as “trojan horses” that are designed to undermine the company’s business.

He said the misuse of the shareholder resolution process ultimately harmed other investors and the stance was a necessary measure to protect the interests of its broader shareholder base.

He said: “We think the process was being abused to the detriment of the rest of the shareholders.”

Woods added that ExxonMobil is ready to pursue similar actions in the future if proposals do not follow established protocols and regulatory guidance.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More