FRC Stewardship Code tiers show leaders and laggards

14 November 2016

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The UK's Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has revealed its first Stewardship Code tiering. For the first time, asset manager laggards have been threatened with de-listing; those in the lower tier 3 have been six months to improve.

There are nearly 300 signatories to the Code, more than 120 are in the top tier 1, an increase from approximately 40 at the beginning of the exercise. This represents nearly 90% of assets under management of members of the Investment Association. The FRC began the tiering process in December last year and wrote to all the existing signatories.  Following this contact the regulator said over 200 fund managers approached it to improve their reporting against the code.

The assessments focused on the quality of descriptions of signatories’ approach to stewardship and their explanations in accordance with the ‘comply or explain’ basis of the Code.

Constructive Approach by Fund Managers

Speaking to Manifest in August David Styles, Director of Corporate Governance at the FRC, explained that the exercise had generated positive feedback from fund managers. As a result, the regulator decided to move from just two tiers as had been originally proposed to three. This he said would distinguish between those signatories who had made efforts to improve their reporting but not yet achieved tier one, and those who had not improved their statements at all.

 He said: “The process has been positive and constructive. A significant number of signatories have contacted us, saying they want to improve. They appreciated our individual approach to each of them and many admitted they do a lot more stewardship work than they are reporting on.”

He added: “We want to give everyone the opportunity to improve their reporting.”

Clients can hold fund managers to account on stewardship issues

The FRC hopes that the tiering of fund managers will also help clients, such as pension funds, who should now be better placed to use the more transparent reporting to discuss with asset managers their different approaches to stewardship and ensure that these best meet their needs. The assessment of fund managers was welcomed by ShareAction, which campaigns for more responsible share ownership and encourages pension fund members to take more control of the money invested on their behalf.

Stewardship stakeholders welcome findings

Catherine Howarth ShareAction Chief Executive said: “We welcome this valuable exercise by the FRC. “Tiering is a critical tool to hold fund managers to account on their stewardship activities. The Stewardship Code will only function effectively if the high standards expected of its signatories are monitored and enforced.

 

“ShareAction’s annual stewardship and transparency rankings of fund managers and pension funds reveal that while some do serious work on stewardship, the industry as a whole is falling short of the standard needed to properly protect UK pension savers. Effective stewardship of companies by professional investors is essential when millions of us rely on long-term returns from private pensions for our income in retirement. Box ticking is not good enough."

The assessment of UK fund managers was also welcomed by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). The IIRC is a global ESG reporting coalition of regulators, investors, companies, standard setters, the accounting profession and NGOs. Richard Howitt, its chief executive said: "The adoption of stewardship codes is becoming a feature of best practice corporate governance around the world. The FRC's focus on ensuring the highest quality of reporting by fund managers against the code sets a new benchmark.

"The advancement of investor stewardship, alongside strong corporate governance, is creating the conditions for better dialogue between boards and investors. Increasingly this dialogue is based on strategic information which is at the heart of the whole movement towards integrated reporting by companies worldwide."

Related Stories

Stewardship after the 2026 Code: Clarity on purpose, friction in practice

April 29, 2026
Read More

Augmenting Alignment: Investor & Issuer Forum Creates Collaborative Compass

December 19, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Reporting Reinforcement: FRC Issues Stewardship and Remuneration Guidance

November 14, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Backing BPPG: Industry Experts Voice Support for Proxy Advisors’ Position

October 17, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Investors Drive FTSE 100 to Put Climate Plans to Vote

September 5, 2025

Editor

Read More

The Democrats Strike Back: Asset Managers Pushed on “Responsible Stewardship” Commitment

August 26, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More