French companies improve corporate governance disclosures

20 September 2010

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Supreme Court Curbs Activist Lawsuits Against Investment Funds

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

SHareholder meeting

UK moves to scrap TCFD product reporting

SHareholder meeting

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Minerva Briefing

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

The findings of the 2010 AMF report on the corporate governance of listed companies, based on a sample of 60 companies (34 in the CAC 40 and 26 in the SBF 120), show improvements both in practices and in transparency with regard to corporate governance and executive compensation. However the AMF highlights some areas of concern for companies to address in the coming year.

Some of the key findings on corporate governance are:

  • 60% of companies reporting non-compliance with some of the AFEP/MEDEF Code's provisions, with one-fifth of these not including any explanations;
  • An average of 55% of boards are comprised of independent directors, while 88% of audit committees and 79% of compensation committees are chaired by an independent director. Some companies in the same however did not identify which directors the board considered to be independent;
  • 9 companies in the sample have introduced (or intend to introduce) a lead independent director or deputy chairman with responsibility for governance;
  • Two-thirds of companies undertook a board evaluation during the year.

The AMF has been encouraged by progress on the number of female directors but urges companies "to pursue a broader-based approach to boardroom diversity". The AMF also comes out in favour of tougher rules on multiple directorships.

On director independence, the AMF highlights the need to provide detailed and sufficiently clear explanations about the application of the independence criteria in the AFEP/MEDEF code, especially the criterion on business relations: "not to be a customer, supplier, investment banker or commercial banker that is material for the corporation or its group, or for a significant part of whose business the corporation or its group accounts". Indeed this is an area where Manifest has been disappointed by the quality of disclosures and any improvements in 2010 annual reports would certainly be welcome.


Further Reading

Rapport 2010 de l’AMF sur le gouvernement d’entreprise et la rémunération des dirigeants (French language document)

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
French Sustainable Investment Forum

FIR’s VOICE framework puts structure around measuring stewardship influence

June 11, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas redomicile passes with high dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More