15 October 2016
Sarah Wilson


In its 2016 AGM results announcement, Sky plc suggested that shareholders voted against James Murdoch because of proxy analysts rather than facts surrounding Murdoch's appointment.
As a UK incorporated Plc, Sky’s governance arrangements fall under the remit of the UK Governance Code which is maintained by the Financial Reporting Council, the UK’s independent regulator for corporate reporting and governance. The FRC has a memorandum of understanding with the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, in respect of company law and accounting issues. This is what the UK Governance Code says about board chair appointments:
“The chairman should on appointment meet the independence criteria set out in B.1.1 below. A chief executive should not go on to be chairman of the same company. If exceptionally a board decides that a chief executive should become chairman, the board should consult major shareholders in advance and should set out its reasons to shareholders at the time of the appointment and in the next annual report.”
“The board should state its reasons if it determines that a director is independent notwithstanding the existence of relationships or circumstances which may appear relevant to its determination, including if the director:
This information was correct as @ time of first publication 15th October 2016
Contact us via Twitter @manifestproxy | Google+ |


Jack Grogan-Fenn

Jack Grogan-Fenn