Greenpeace ordered to pay over $660m for anti-fossil fuel protest

27 March 2025

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Greenpeace ordered to pay over $660m for anti-fossil fuel protest

March 27, 2025

A North Dakota jury has ruled that Greenpeace must pay more than $660 million in damages for its involvement in an anti-fossil fuel protest against Energy Transfer.

The Dallas-based oil company alleged that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption, and property damage during protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016.

Energy Transfer also accused Greenpeace of trespassing, creating a nuisance, and engaging in civil conspiracy.

Greenpeace argued, however, that while the protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation attracted thousands, it did not lead the demonstration. Instead, it claimed the protests were led by local Indigenous leaders who opposed the pipeline.

The organisation also argued that the lawsuit threatened its freedom of speech, accusing Energy Transfer of filing a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), which have been criticised as a method for undermining free speech and the right to assemble.

While 35 states in the US have anti-SLAPP laws designed to prevent these types of lawsuits, North Dakota is one of the states that does not have such legislation.

Sushma Raman, interim executive director of Greenpeace, Greenpeace Fund, said: “This case should alarm everyone, no matter their political inclinations,

“We should all be concerned about the future of the first amendment, and lawsuits like this aimed at destroying our rights to peaceful protest and free speech. These rights are critical for any work toward ensuring justice – and that’s why we will continue fighting back together, in solidarity. While Big Oil bullies can try to stop a single group, they can’t stop a movement.”

In response to the jury’s verdict, Greenpeace stated that Energy Transfer's claims were false and vowed to continue challenging the case, including by appealing to the North Dakota Supreme Court.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

You can read more of our articles by clicking here.

Related Stories

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

Trump’s Anti DEI Order Heads to Court as Investors Hold the Line

April 30, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More