Group of 11 states sue three major asset managers over coal reduction goals

5 December 2024

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

EU Parliament signals more enforceable path for SFDR 2.0

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Group of 11 states sue three major asset managers over coal reduction goals

December 5th, 2024

A coalition of 11 US states has filed a lawsuit against BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, accusing them of using their shares in major oil companies to restrict the coal market and harm customers.

In the lawsuit, the attorney generals of the states involved claimed that the three asset managers have exploited their collective power through proxy voting and other actions to pressure some of the largest US coal producers to accommodate to green energy goals.

In fact, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleges that the “investment cartel” weaponised their shares to push companies to reduce coal output by more than half by 2030.

The suit further claims that Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street used their memberships in the Climate Action 100 and the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative to signal their intent to reduce the output of thermal coal, which increased the cost of electricity for Americans.

The lawsuit said: “As demand for the electricity Americans need to heat their homes and power their businesses has gone up, the supply of the coal used to generate that electricity has been artificially depressed—and the price has skyrocketed,

Defendants have reaped the rewards of higher returns, higher fees, and higher profits, while American consumers have paid the price in higher utility bills and higher costs.”

In addition to conspiring to reduce the output of coal, the lawsuit also accuses BlackRock of deceiving investors. It claims that investors who chose non-ESG funds to maximise profits were misled, as these funds were actually pursuing ESG strategies.

As a result, the lawsuit seeks to prohibit the trio from using their shares in coal companies to vote on shareholder resolutions and initiate other steps to stop the restraint of trade and commerce.

It also claims that their actions violated multiple federal laws, including Texas’ antitrust and deceptive trade practices laws, that prevent major shareholders from using their shares to reduce competition or engage in other anticompetitive practices.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

You can read more of our articles by clicking here.

Related Stories

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More
AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More