Hong Kong corporate governance scorecard shows improvement needed

16 February 2017

Editor

EU regulation

The latest corporate governance scorecard assessing listed companies in Hong Kong shows that improvement is needed and directors ought to stay up to speed with the latest corporate governance developments, according to the Hong Kong Institute of Directors.

The 2016 survey of 120 companies published this week found that when compared to the 121 firms assessed for the last survey in 2012 mean score had improved by 5.1% when the same criteria were compared. However the latest survey had added new criteria which corresponded to the 2015 edition of the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. These additional areas of assessment included risk management structure and functions, CSR reporting timeliness and quality, and the structure of the corporate governance committee. When these areas were added the scores were at the same level as in 2012.

The Hong Kong Institute of Directors said the survey found there was room for improvement in corporate governance among companies newly listed and new constituents of indices in the past four years. The report said that this pointed to the need for company directors to stay up to speed with corporate governance developments and gain new knowledge so that they could drive the sustainable and professional development of the corporation that they serve.

Professor Stephen Cheung, president of The Education University of Hong Kong, who led the survey, said: "Good corporate governance is not static, but a process constantly evolving. A company cannot stop at meeting existing requirements, because new requirements based on international best practices and experience are continually surfacing and being promoted.

"This latest survey, for example, asked 30% more questions than the last. We found that, just using the same criteria as in the 2012 survey, the corporate governance standard of the surveyed companies improved on average, but when evaluated based on the updated standards, the companies had not made any advancement. Hence, it is important for Hong Kong-listed companies to take corporate governance more seriously and pay attention to the latest developments in good corporate governance practices."

The criteria of the survey were based on OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and the Corporate Governance Code of the Hong Kong Exchanges. The 120 Hong Kong-listed firms were evaluated in five areas the rights of shareholders; the equitable treatment of shareholders; role of stakeholders: disclosure and transparency and board responsibilities based on their publicly available data published in 2015-2016.

The 2016 HKIoD Corporate Governance Score-card survey,  was conducted by a research team of the Centre for Corporate Governance and Financial Policy of Hong Kong Baptist University advised by Cheung.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Accountability Versus Allocation: Who Is Corporate Reporting For?

SHareholder meeting

SFDR Review Moves Forward, But Key Questions Remain for Investors

SHareholder meeting

German governance code reform: Minerva supports simplification, but draws a line at investor visibility

SHareholder meeting

FRC’s new regulatory approach signals a shift from rule-making to market stewardship

SHareholder meeting

Shein lists in Hong Kong at reduced valuation after protracted IPO journey

SHareholder meeting

SEC sends executive pay disclosure overhaul to White House for review

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

UK Corporate Reporting

Accountability Versus Allocation: Who Is Corporate Reporting For?

September 11, 2026
Read More
Growth with weakened governance poses risks, FCA warns

Growth with weakened governance poses risks, FCA warns

August 13, 2026
Read More
APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC corporate governance reforms: Japan and Australia shift focus to governance effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: Simplification, but at What Cost for Investor Protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More
Exon logo

ExxonMobil’s Texas Redomicile Passes with High Dissent

June 5, 2026
Read More