Do investors need more ESG experts?

23 March 2017

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Yes, says UK-based environmental think tank, E3G, which also believes global investors to rapidly increase their environmental, social and governance (ESG) capacity and to train all staff to be aware of ESG issues. According to E3G's research, a third of the investor signatories to the Principles for Responsible for Investment (PRI) do not employ any ESG specialists and that a further 20% employ only one such expert.

This means, E3G said, that over 500 of these world leading investment companies, managing $6.9 trillion in assets, employ one or fewer experts in responsible investment.

E3G said that the globally agreed goal of keeping the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C, was enshrined in the Paris Agreement on climate change, can only be met if investors fully appraise and respond to the risks and opportunities posed by climate change.

The report said that by "By failing to employ ESG, specialists these investors are not only putting their client’s assets at risk, they are putting global economic stability at risk by increasing the chances of an economic shock as dangerous levels of climate change unfold."

E3G believes that the globally-agreed goal of keeping the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C, as enshrined in the Paris Agreement on climate change, can only be met if investors fully appraise and respond to the risks and opportunities posed by climate change.

"By failing to employ ESG specialists these investors are not only putting their client’s assets at risk, they are putting global economic stability at risk by increasing the chances of an economic shock as dangerous levels of climate change unfold." E3G said.

Ingrid Holmes, director of E3G said: “If these companies do not have the capacity to assess climate change risk they are not only putting their own companies at risk, they are locking in investment in a high carbon future that has the potential to cause a global economic crash.  These investors are at the heart of the solution to avoiding dangerous climate change. Climate change is a global emergency and the investment community must now act accordingly.”

Related Stories

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More

ISSB Prepares for Final SASB Updates with New Proposals

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More