Japan: sustainability reporting needs improvement

29 January 2017

Editor

EU regulation

The Japanese Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) recenlty tweeted about the "excellent" integrated reporting of some of the country's firms. However, Manifest's analysis shows that sustainability reporting in Japan is falling short of many investors expectations.

Based on analysis of the Japanese companies reviewed for Manifest's Say on Sustainability project during the 2016 reporting season, the average percentage score awarded was only 32% - a low grade D - only just above the grade E boundary of 30%. This compares with   EU - C/53%; UK - D/40%; and US - D/40% and Australia - D/37%.

Japanese reporting - few high achievers

Although Mitsubishi and MHI were rated as "excellent" by GPIF, no Japanese companies achieved the top A grade, and only three companies (6% of the sample) have achieved a B.

CompanySay on Sustainability
Grade% ScoreJSR
B 65% Sony B 65% Toshiba B 67% Mitsubishi Heavy Industries C 47% Mitsubishi D 31%

Out of date disclosure a systemic problem for Japan

Just as investors depend on up to date disclosure of core financial metrics, many investors expect to see sustainability reporting to also be published in a timely way. The majority of the companies in Manifest's sample produced a separate sustainability report (91%),  however all of these reports are produced late - that is not published within 6 months of the relevant year-end. Very worryingly, a significant proportion of the reports are two or three years out of date (26% of the entire of sample and 29% of late reporters). However, this may not be entirely surprising given that the financial statements and annual reports of the majority were also not up to date with the financial year at time of assessment (80%) with a similar of proportion of websites being out of date (78%).

Poor carbon emission disclosure

Most of the companies analysed (61%) do audit their work to some extent. In terms of carbon disclosure the largest group (22 companies/41%) disclosure just their total emissions while 11 companies (20%) provide a breakdown of emissions. However, nine companies (17%) do not disclose their emissions at all.

Manifest's research also found that only 12 companies (22%) disclose on their political donations or their policy on this and only five (9% of all companies, 42% of those that do disclose) of these are clear about their policy.

GPIF has highlighted its commitment to sustainability and good stewardship by joining the 30% Club in the UK and the Thirty Percent Coalition in the US. GPIF said it believes that integration of environment, social and governance (ESG) factors into the  investment process mitigates investment risk. It stated that it believes that gender diversity is regarded as one of major ESG factors.

For more information about the Manifest Say on Sustainability framework and data sets, email sustainability@manifest.info

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ICCR urges investors to encourage company support against Rule 14a-8 rescission proposal

SHareholder meeting

Fifteen financial institutions push ISSB towards dedicated Nature Standard

SHareholder meeting

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

SHareholder meeting

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

SHareholder meeting

Tesla’s 2026 AGM sees no shareholder proposals for first time in over a decade

SHareholder meeting

Procter & Gamble shareholder rights proposals draw significant support

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 United States of America Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

US SEC Rule 14a-8 Rescission Proposal

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

October 23, 2026
Read More
ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny

ESMA ratchets up greenwashing scrutiny – stewardship claims now in scope

October 14, 2026
Read More

FCA opts for comply-or-explain climate disclosures in retreat from mandatory reporting

October 2, 2026
Read More

Sustainability reporting requirements boost climate-related financial disclosures, ASIC says

September 23, 2026
Read More
Minerva to SEC: climate disclosure should be fixed, not scrapped

Minerva to SEC: climate disclosure should be fixed, not scrapped

August 6, 2026
Read More
China sharpens the lens on financial institution governance

China sharpens the lens on financial institution governance

August 4, 2026
Read More