Manifest welcomes FRC's role in Stewardship Code

18 April 2010

Sarah Wilson

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Manifest has welcomed the Financial Reporting Council's role as the new guardian of an institutional investor Stewardship Code but has proposed that the Code itself should be the subject of its own consultation rather than a simple grandfathering of the existing ISC principles.

Proposals for a parallel code for investors to sit alongside the UK Governance Code emerged from the Walker Review when many respondents, including Manifest, highlighted the need for a more transparent and representative mechanism for investor governance was needed.

A key theme in the Walker Review was Sir David's concerns that boards of Banks and other Financial Institutions (BOFIs) had become held captive to Group Think. Manifest argues that a number of investors have fallen into the same trap and that the majority of active ownership is being undertaken for the benefit of the many by a select few. "The progress of the Stewardship Code will be watched carefully on a global stage," said Manifest CEO, Sarah Wilson, "just as the Cadbury Code was ground breaking in its day, the Stewardship Code has the potential to become best practice principles for global investors, irrespective of domicile"

Commenting on calls for greater transparency by proxy voting agencies, Manifest has said that it welcomes the opportunity to dispel some of the myths surrounding corporate governance advice, and looks forward to a robust dialogue with the FRC in the future. Wilson cautions against “ghettoising” the governance community with its own special code of conduct which she says: "would reinforce the perceived separateness of corporate governance from the investment process and defeat the object of the exercise which is to ensure that voting decisions are based on the best possible practices and integrated with the portfolio management process. The received wisdom in many houses is that governance is a non-value adding activity to be outsourced wholesale at the lowest possible unit price with little regard for quality or consequences."

Links

FRC Stewardship Code - Manifest's Response >>

Related Stories

Stewardship after the 2026 Code: Clarity on purpose, friction in practice

April 29, 2026
Read More

Consultation Showcases Support for UK Voluntary Sustainability Disclosure

February 3, 2026
Read More

Augmenting Alignment: Investor & Issuer Forum Creates Collaborative Compass

December 19, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Reporting Reinforcement: FRC Issues Stewardship and Remuneration Guidance

November 14, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Augmenting Assurance: Minerva Stresses ARGA Must Avoid International Fragmentation

September 19, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Reinforcing Stewardship: Minerva Renews UK Code Signature

August 13, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More