Musk defends $56 billion Tesla pay packet in court

18 November 2022

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Musk defends $56 billion Tesla pay packet in court

November 18, 2022

Elon Musk has appeared in court to defend his $56 billion Tesla pay package against claims he dictated its terms to the company’s board.

Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta has sued Musk and the board and hopes to prove the world’s wealthiest person used his dominance at the firm to obtain an outsized compensation package that did not require him to work at the electric car maker full-time.

Read Minerva's previous coverage of Elon Musk and Tesla:

https://www.old.manifest.co.uk/tesla-overcomes-activist-investors-at-agm/

Questioned by Tornetta's lawyer, Greg Varallo, the billionaire admitted he made some decisions without the approval of the company's directors but rejected claims his pay package goals were easy to achieve.

The new owner of Twitter told the Delaware Court of Chancery in Wilmington it had been a painful process for him to rescue Tesla from the brink of collapse in 2017 and restore it to explosive growth.

Varallo repeatedly sought to portray Tesla as a company under the grip of Musk and tried to show he bypassed its board on several occasions.

One cited example was that Musk said he made a unilateral call on ending Tesla's acceptance of Bitcoin cryptocurrency and acknowledged the board was not informed before he told analysts in October that Tesla's board was considering buying back up to $10 billion of stock.

But Musk's testimony during the five-day trial did not prove who developed his 2018 pay package or establish whether it was a product of his demands rather than negotiations with the board.

Musk has a history of combative testimony and has called lawyers "reprehensible", but he was relatively restrained in Wednesday's proceedings, though at times he expressed frustration with Tornetta's attorney.

At one point, Musk told the lawyer: “Your question is a complex question that is commonly used to mislead people."

Musk acknowledged that he was not a lawyer, but added: “When you're in enough lawsuits you pick up a few things."

Related Stories

Executive Pay Upset: Trump Proposes U$5m Defence Sector Remuneration Cap

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Income “Insanity”: Sanders Lambasts Tesla CEO Musk’s U$1tn Pay Package

December 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Reporting Reinforcement: FRC Issues Stewardship and Remuneration Guidance

November 14, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Remuneration Retraction: ANZ Bonuses Pulled Amid Misconduct Scandal

November 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

What’s Up Down Under: Australia Peak AGM Season Snapshot

October 29, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Canadian Compensation Crackdown: CCGG Issues Executive Pay-focused Guidebook

October 10, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More