Norges Bank pushes four companies for independent chairs

2 October 2009

Sarah Wilson

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), the investment arm of the Norwegian central bank and asset manager for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund and the Government Petroleum Insurance Fund managing over NOK1,000bn (£107bn) in equity investments, has filed shareholder proposals at four US companies calling for independent chairmanship.

Meetings at Harris Corporation (23rd OCtober), Parker Hannifin (28th October), Cardinal Health (4th November) and Clorox Company (18th November) will all see the NBIM resolutions voted upon. NBIM, member of the ICGN, UN PRI signatory and an established leader in global ESG engagement, has for some time been open about the possibility of using shareholder proposals as a means of fostering better corporate governance practices as a considered part of a wider engagement strategy.

Board and director independence has formed a key part of NBIM engagement work on governance with companies in recent years, and it will be expected that these four resolutions will further harness their momentum.

In 2006, NBIM made it clear that the use of shareholder proposals is likely, "especially in the US market, where the use of these proposals is most common"(NBIM Annual Report, 2006). These proposals therefore come as little surprise, especially given that "it is particularly in areas prioritised by Norges Bank for its corporate governance work ... that we may see concrete shareholder proposals from NBIM in the years ahead. But efforts to bring about important changes will rarely be served by starting out with a shareholder proposal, or by filing a shareholder proposal without the company seeing the bigger picture of which the investor's proposal is part" (op. cit.).

Related Stories

AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More

BP’s Climate Block Brings Investor Backlash

April 8, 2026
Read More

Proposal Exclusion Escalation: BP Issued “Legal Ultimatum” Over Rejected Resolution

March 27, 2026
Read More