Pressing on Pay: Next Shareholders Strongly Support Living Wage Resolution

23 May 2025

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Pressing on Pay: Next Shareholders Strongly Support Living Wage Resolution

May 23, 2025

By Daniel Kehoe

A shareholder resolution at clothing retailer Next requesting action on low pay secured 26.01% votes in favour and the company now has six months to directly respond to investor concerns.

Due to the strength of support for the resolution, the company must consult investors on their qualms and outline how they expect to respond, including any actions that will be taken to address issues around low page and wage transparency.

Including abstentions 29.23% of votes went against Next’s Board of Directors, which had recommended that their shareholders vote against the proposal.

The proposal, backed by co-filers including AXA Investment Managers, Scottish Widows, Friends Provident Foundation and the Church of England Pensions Board, called for greater transparency around Next’s process for wage-setting, as well as a clear evaluation of paying the real Living Wage.

The efforts of this coalition have been rewarded. The votes in favour meet the UK Corporate Governance Code’s stipulation that any resolution receiving more than 20% opposition obliges the company to consult the shareholders who voted against management, understand their concerns and report back within six months.

The Company has already agreed to increase their wage transparency in their next annual report in 2026. They will also provide a formal update in November 2025.

As the proposal received over 20% of votes in favour it will now qualify for the Investment Association’s public register, a tool used by shareholders, asset managers and analysts to track investor dissent.

This helps to promote corporate accountability, better engagement between companies and shareholders, and further highlight how companies respond to significant shareholder opposition.

This attention is likely to intensify the scrutiny of assets managers, such as Norges Bank Investment Management and APG in the Netherlands who recommended a vote against the proposal. It is also worth noting that Minerva’s Governance Report analysis indicated the proposed resolution could have significant material benefits for the company and its shareholders if enacted, such as improved employee retention and increased company reputation.

A proposal of this nature showcases the growing disconnect between executive pay and employee wages. ShareAction had previously filed a similar claim in 2022 at Sainsbury's, where they requested that the Company become an accredited Living Wage employer by gaining official recognition from the Living Wage Foundation by 2023.

While this proposal received 16.25% votes in favour, it failed to obtain the 20% threshold due to opposition from Schroders, ultimately preventing it from qualifying for the Investment Association’s public register.

It will be interesting to see if this vote was in fact a turning point for social proposals and whether we see a similar pattern at the 2025 Marks & Spencer’s and JD Sports’ upcoming AGMs. Shareholders, including asset managers, should now be more than aware that social issues are gaining traction, as investors are no longer staying silent and are looking to voice their concerns more veraciously than in previous years.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

You can read more of our articles by clicking here.

Related Stories

AGM

BP’s AGM votes: governance opacity, not just protest

April 24, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More