PRI: Shareholders sceptical of RI regulation

11 December 2016

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

New research published by the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) has found that investors are sceptical about whether or not regulation is is driving real ESG change and alignment with sustainable development goals.

The report analyses nearly 300 pieces of regulation covering pension fund rules, stewardship codes and corporate disclosure rules.  It also interviewed policymakers, investors and stock exchanges in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas to find out if these initiatives change the way investors think about ESG, and ultimately the signals they send to their investee companies.

After looking at the data, the PRI said the analysis suggests that while regulation is having an impact, regulatory frameworks aren’t fully aligned with sustainable development.  Underpinning this is a belief that governments are failing to clearly signal the importance of ESG issues.

Nathan Fabian, director of policy and research at the PRI said: "Too often, the drafting of ESG regulation treats ESG as an optional add on, which investors can ignore if they so choose. We also see little monitoring of ESG-related clauses. While policymakers we spoke to discussed the techniques they use for monitoring the impact of regulation, this often falls short of holding individual investors to account – and the results are rarely made public."

The PRI's research also found that policymakers haven’t made the link between their ESG goals – such as the COP21 agenda or the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – and the financial system.  While policymakers in China, the EU and France have started to discuss these issues, no government has yet articulated the role they expect institutional investors to play in achieving those goals, PRI said.

The PRI said it hoped that the report will help governments make the crucial link between sustainable development and the finance industry. In order to do that, the PRI believes governments should collect – and publish – more information on how investors contribute to or undermine sustainable development objectives.  They also need to monitor and assess the effectiveness of existing responsible investment regulation.

Related Stories

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More

Why Switzerland’s Proposed Sustainability Bill Matters for Investors

April 9, 2026
Read More

Quarterly Reporting: The Next Target in the SEC’s Stewardship Retreat

April 7, 2026
Read More

ISSB Prepares for Final SASB Updates with New Proposals

April 2, 2026

Alex Whitebrook

Read More