Sports Direct’s independent shareholders remain unconvinced

8 January 2017

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

A majority of Sports Direct independent shareholders remain sceptical of governance improvements at the troubled retailer and last week voted against the re-election of its chairman, Keith Hellawell. Under UK listing rules, the retailer had been forced to hold a general meeting to vote again on his reappointment after most independent shareholders voted against him at the company's AGM last September.

The proxy voting results show that 54% of Sports Direct shareholders voted against Hellawell's re-appointment. However, he continues to have the full support of Mike Ashley, the majority shareholder, founder and chief executive of Sports Direct which meant overall there was a 80% backing for the chairman.

Hellawell had come under criticism because of the corporate governance failings that emerged at the company over the last year. These were identified in a report by MPs and a separate report by the company's law firm RPC. Hellawell has said that if he fails to receive the full support of the independent shareholders at the 2017 AGM he would resign with immediate effect.

Ashley  said: "Keith has my full backing and will be continuing in his role on the basis that he has the unanimous support of the board. I note that many of those who voted against Keith have acknowledged that we have made positive progress since the AGM."

In its latest results in December the company announced a drop in profits and Hellawell hit out against what he described as an extreme political, union and media campaign waged against this company which he said had  damaged its reputation, staff morale and influenced its customers.

The company is due to announce the details of an independent review of its corporate governance which was demanded by investors last year. Sports Direct has been engaging with investors, through the Investors Forum, in order to get the review under way and said in December that it would announce the review chairman shortly.

Speaking to the Guardian newspaper, Sarah Wilson, chief executive of the shareholder proxy voting service Manifest, said Hellawell must stand aside at the September 2017 AGM and Sports Direct had to make big changes: "They have eight months until the next AGM to get new people in. They are losing goodwill and this is an existential threat to the business, and they have to respond to do something about it."

Related Stories

ES issues gaining more support from female fund managers

February 10, 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Read More

Audit-related voting still rare

March 25, 2019

Editor

Read More

Compass Group AGM: 37% dissent on “overboarded” NED

January 31, 2019

Editor

Read More

Australia's 2017 AGM season "less tumultuous" than 2016

February 2, 2018

Editor

Read More

Indian Proxy Season 2017: A tipping point for shareholder activism

December 4, 2017

Editor

Read More

South Africa: Investors ready to oppose auditor re-appointments

September 17, 2017

Editor

Read More