Transaction-based awards and CEO pay

25 March 2019

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

AGM Update:

Following the 29 March AGM, Micro Focus disclosed that the Remuneration Report was defeated with a 50.4% vote against - on a non-binding basis.  

Shareholders have become accustomed to the concept of pay for performance, but pay for transactions rarely attract the same level of scrutiny. Micro Focus International plc (LON: MCRO) offers an interesting case study on the impact of transactions.

Micro Focus International plc’s CEO Christopher Hsu resigned in March 2018 after only around six months service. Hsu was appointed as CEO in September 2017 following the completion of the reverse takeover of Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) software assets. However, after Micro Focus issued a profit warning following a fall in sales and integration concerns, Hsu stepped down from the board.

This year's annual report notes that Hsu received a payment of $5.9m to cover the grossed-up costs of the excise tax incurred as a result of US “inversion” tax treatment of the merger. While the payment of tax gross-ups is common in the US, international investors may be both surprised and disappointed by the lack of transparency regarding the payment.

Stephen Murdoch has since been appointed as the new CEO. Murdoch served as CEO prior to the merger but stood aside to become Chief Operating Officer after the transaction completed. Murdoch’s salary has been set at £850,000, 66% higher than the £512,500 salary he received as CEO prior to the deal.

Micro Focus made additional share grants to executives in 2017 after the HPE software transaction. The awards were due to vest on 6 September 2019, subject to meeting a performance condition based on shareholder returns. However, the Remuneration Committee used its discretion to replace the awards with new awards and extend the target deadline to by another year to September 2020. Micro Focus’s share price significantly fell after the profit warning meaning the awards were unlikely to vest.

During the year additional share grants awarded in 2014 in connection to the acquisition of Attachmate Group vested in full. The awards were also based solely on shareholder returns over a three-year period and required a growth of 100% to vest in full. The Committee report the value of the awards received by executives amounted to £55.5m in aggregate with executive chair Kevin Loosemore receiving the largest award of over £25m.

The Committee states it is aware of the distorting impact the additional grants can have and are not planning on making future awards at this time and will undertake a review of its reward strategy in 2019 ahead of a new policy being put to the vote at the 2020 AGM. Nevertheless, shareholders may well be concerned by awards of additional share grants and probably consider them to be a form of transaction-based award which results in excessive pay.

Related Stories

Executive Pay Upset: Trump Proposes U$5m Defence Sector Remuneration Cap

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Succession Plan Scrutiny: AMF Explores Succession Planning Governance Risks

December 17, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Income “Insanity”: Sanders Lambasts Tesla CEO Musk’s U$1tn Pay Package

December 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Patching Proxy Plumbing: CII Urges SEC to Improve Voting Transparency

October 31, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Musk Malcontent: Tesla CEO’s Pay Package Pushback Intensifies

October 29, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Canadian Compensation Crackdown: CCGG Issues Executive Pay-focused Guidebook

October 10, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More