US directors need to do more to manage risks

6 February 2016

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

While US directors say that reputational risk is one of their greatest concerns board members are taking little action to manage risks once they have been identified, according to the sixth Concerns About Risks Confronting Boards survey conducted by US accounting firm EisnerAmper.

The report's authors said that there was  a broad trend of boards that identify risk but leave the action to manage the risks to those in the day-to-day operational roles, which means that boards are not addressing the risks in a more comprehensive fashion.

The survey of the directors of over 300 US boards carried out in 2015 found that the risk issues of most concern were reputational risk 75%; cyber security/IT risk 61%, regulatory compliance risk 53% and senior management succession planning 51%, which the authors said is consistent with the results of the previous surveys conducted over the past three years across public, private and not-for-profit boards.

Manifest’s recent
UK Cyber-security &
Investor Engagement
report is available by email

Given the high profile of cyber security risk and the growth of social media the survey this year contained specific questions for directors in these areas. The report's authors note that social media is intrinsically linked to a company’s reputation and image and argue that organisations and boards should consider social media as one of the most important risks to manage and monitor.

However, the survey found that only 6% of boards feel as though they are well-versed in social media risk, and 67% of organisations are not engaging external consultants to monitor social media. The results indicate that boards may not fully understand the potential impact and harm social media can have on a company’s reputation, according to EisnerAmper.

The survey also found that cyber security is the most recognised specific risk, emerging as a concern for 70% of respondents on public company boards. More than 95% of public companies either use internal audit or external auditors/consultants to monitor cyber risk. However, only 24% felt their boards are well-versed in understanding cybersecurity risk and another 10% felt that they are falling short of fully understanding the risk.

Charly Weinstein, EisnerAmper Chief Executive Officer said, “Because social media and cyber security are intrinsically linked to a company’s reputation and image, organisations and boards should consider both as among the most important risks to manage and monitor. With today’s media capable of capturing every crisis occurring within organizations, it is becoming increasingly evident how connected reputation, cybersecurity and social media are in relation to risk.”

“The findings strongly reflect the accelerating pace of change facing directors. To fulfill their commitments to their stakeholders, board members need to ensure that their organizations are informed, educated and forward-focused," Weinstein added.

The survey concluded that while companies are beginning to take the proper steps to prepare for a reputational crisis by having plans in place, providing training and employing an internal audit function, fewer than 50 percent of respondents feel they are “well-versed” in the issues.

Related Stories

Starbucks’ Shareholder Showdown: Investors Issue ‘Vote No’ Campaign Against Director Duo

February 23, 2026
Read More

Taking Tesla to Task: Shareholders Rally Against Musk’s Pay Package

October 3, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Minerva Analytics Files Texas Public Information Act Request as State Escalates Campaign Against Proxy Advisors

September 18, 2025

home

Read More

From Super-Voting to Equal Voting: Lyft’s Class B Share Conversion

September 12, 2025

Editor

Read More

The White House Loyalty Scorecard: Blurring the Lines Between State and Market

September 11, 2025

Editor

Read More

Stewardship Under Siege: Minerva CEO Criticises Regulatory Attacks on Proxy Advisors

June 24, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More