US directors need to do more to manage risks

6 February 2016

Editor

EU regulation

While US directors say that reputational risk is one of their greatest concerns board members are taking little action to manage risks once they have been identified, according to the sixth Concerns About Risks Confronting Boards survey conducted by US accounting firm EisnerAmper.

The report's authors said that there was  a broad trend of boards that identify risk but leave the action to manage the risks to those in the day-to-day operational roles, which means that boards are not addressing the risks in a more comprehensive fashion.

The survey of the directors of over 300 US boards carried out in 2015 found that the risk issues of most concern were reputational risk 75%; cyber security/IT risk 61%, regulatory compliance risk 53% and senior management succession planning 51%, which the authors said is consistent with the results of the previous surveys conducted over the past three years across public, private and not-for-profit boards.

Manifest’s recent
UK Cyber-security &
Investor Engagement
report is available by email

Given the high profile of cyber security risk and the growth of social media the survey this year contained specific questions for directors in these areas. The report's authors note that social media is intrinsically linked to a company’s reputation and image and argue that organisations and boards should consider social media as one of the most important risks to manage and monitor.

However, the survey found that only 6% of boards feel as though they are well-versed in social media risk, and 67% of organisations are not engaging external consultants to monitor social media. The results indicate that boards may not fully understand the potential impact and harm social media can have on a company’s reputation, according to EisnerAmper.

The survey also found that cyber security is the most recognised specific risk, emerging as a concern for 70% of respondents on public company boards. More than 95% of public companies either use internal audit or external auditors/consultants to monitor cyber risk. However, only 24% felt their boards are well-versed in understanding cybersecurity risk and another 10% felt that they are falling short of fully understanding the risk.

Charly Weinstein, EisnerAmper Chief Executive Officer said, “Because social media and cyber security are intrinsically linked to a company’s reputation and image, organisations and boards should consider both as among the most important risks to manage and monitor. With today’s media capable of capturing every crisis occurring within organizations, it is becoming increasingly evident how connected reputation, cybersecurity and social media are in relation to risk.”

“The findings strongly reflect the accelerating pace of change facing directors. To fulfill their commitments to their stakeholders, board members need to ensure that their organizations are informed, educated and forward-focused," Weinstein added.

The survey concluded that while companies are beginning to take the proper steps to prepare for a reputational crisis by having plans in place, providing training and employing an internal audit function, fewer than 50 percent of respondents feel they are “well-versed” in the issues.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ICCR urges investors to encourage company support against Rule 14a-8 rescission proposal

SHareholder meeting

Fifteen financial institutions push ISSB towards dedicated Nature Standard

SHareholder meeting

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

SHareholder meeting

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

SHareholder meeting

Tesla’s 2026 AGM sees no shareholder proposals for first time in over a decade

SHareholder meeting

Procter & Gamble shareholder rights proposals draw significant support

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 United States of America Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

US SEC Rule 14a-8 Rescission Proposal

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

IFRS Foundation reform

IFRS Foundation reform: Can smaller IASB and ISSB boards preserve representation?

October 16, 2026
Read More
Minerva Proxy Update

Minerva Proxy Update: Shareholder voting signals continued executive pay, board accountability focus

September 18, 2026
Read More
Proxy Voting Review 2026

Minerva proxy update: Governance reforms, vote no campaigns and AGM results

July 3, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More

Starbucks’ Shareholder Showdown: Investors Issue ‘Vote No’ Campaign Against Director Duo

February 23, 2026
Read More

Taking Tesla to Task: Shareholders Rally Against Musk’s Pay Package

October 3, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More