CSR laggards under pressure

25 February 2010

Sarah Wilson

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

A coalition of international investors representing $2.1 trillion in assets is upping its scrutiny of 'laggard' listed companies with a view to improving their reporting of ESG issues.

The 86 companies have been targetted for their failure to honour the reporting requirements of the UN Global Compact, the world's largest voluntary corporate responsibility initiative.

“Companies that want to attract capital now recognise that reporting of issues such as carbon emissions and corporate governance is becoming as important as the reporting of traditional financial issues,” said executive director of PRI James Gifford.

“In the wake of the financial crisis, many investors believe that analysis of ESG issues is part of a more holistic approach to assessing a company and managing risk.”

In 2008, investor engagement resulted in 33 per cent of laggard companies subsequently submitting their reports, while in 2009 that increased to nearly half, including positive responses from firms such as BHP Billiton, Severn Trent and The Gap, PRI said.

At the beginning of February the Global Compact Office announced that 859 companies were removed (delisted) from the initiative’s database of participants between 1 October 2009 and 1 January 2010. The total number of businesses removed for failure to meet the Global Compact’s mandatory annual reporting requirement now stands at 1840.

The investors in the coalition are all signatories to the UN‐backed Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative (www.unpri.org), and include funds such as Universities Superannuation Scheme, the Swedish Ethical Council (AP1; AP2; AP3; AP4) and Nordea Investment Funds. Principle 3 of the PRI asks investors to seek better and more systematic disclosure from the entities in which they invest.

Links

UN Global Compact Principles >>

De-listed Companies >>

Related Stories

Extinguishing ESG: US House Approves Prohibitive Bill for Pension Funds

January 20, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Sustainability Accountability: ESMA Adds Guidance to Avoid Greenwashing Risks

January 16, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Anti-DEI Drive: Trump’s DOJ Wields Fraud Law to Dissuade Companies

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

White House Targets Proxy Advisors: Washington Puts Voting ‘Plumbing’ on Notice

December 18, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

‘No Action’ Retraction: Costco Accepts Anti-ESG Proposal Despite SEC Overhaul

December 12, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Landmark Lawsuits: Canadian Investors Sued in Two ESG-linked Cases

December 9, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More