ICMA highlights areas of concern in green bond market

20 October 2023

Elizabeth Pfeuti

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

ICMA highlights areas of concern in green bond market 

October 18th, 2023

The International Capital Market Association (ICMA) has identified four key areas of concern for sustainable bonds in its ‘market integrity and greenwashing risks in sustainable finance’ report.

The report highlighted lack of ambition, strategic inconsistency, mismanagement of wider sustainability risks and actual deception as potential challenges for sustainable bonds.

However, the report noted that there was little to no evidence of widespread greenwashing for green and sustainability bonds.

The report’s authors said: “Reviewing existing data and studies on potential greenwashing, we find that greenwashing is not prevalent in the green bond market, but that ambition and materiality in the early development of the new sustainability-linked bond market may have been insufficient.

“Market feedback and our research based on reported controversies and Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) alignment points, however, to a positive trend in the sustainability-linked bond market in the last 12 months.”

The trade body said its Green Bond Principles that it launched in 2014 address many of the areas of concern by encouraging transparency from issues over their ambitions, helping to identify and manage risks and providing guidance on how information on projects should be communicated to investors.

On the sustainable fund industry, the ICMA concurred with wider concerns regarding investment methodologies and fund naming.

It noted: “For the sustainable fund market, market best practice has not led to international agreement on industry standards.

“There are, however, several regulatory initiatives under way, such as on disclosures for investment methodologies and proposals for fund naming to support market integrity.”

The report notes that regulators may not need to further define greenwashing to crack down on the practice and argues “exhaustive” definitions may risk market paralysis.

It proposed a new, focused definition for the practice which could help identify, quantify and regulate greenwashing.

Related Stories

Extinguishing ESG: US House Approves Prohibitive Bill for Pension Funds

January 20, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Sustainability Accountability: ESMA Adds Guidance to Avoid Greenwashing Risks

January 16, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Anti-DEI Drive: Trump’s DOJ Wields Fraud Law to Dissuade Companies

January 9, 2026

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

White House Targets Proxy Advisors: Washington Puts Voting ‘Plumbing’ on Notice

December 18, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

‘No Action’ Retraction: Costco Accepts Anti-ESG Proposal Despite SEC Overhaul

December 12, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Landmark Lawsuits: Canadian Investors Sued in Two ESG-linked Cases

December 9, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More